2006-06-29 03:42:45 · 25 answers · asked by ? 1 in Beauty & Style ➔ Skin & Body
Nope. It was cool when Demi Moore did it because it was new and controversial. This just seems like a desperate ploy for Britney. She looks horrible.
2006-06-29 03:46:32 · answer #1 · answered by Jenn 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If I didn't know any of her history, then she would be sexy in those naked pictures. She has very smooth and clear skin and almost glows, as the say, in the pictures. But her being a bad singer and an extremely bad mother makes her unsexy.
2006-07-04 16:23:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
F*ck Britney, lets talk about Harry Potter!!
2006-06-29 03:55:02 · answer #3 · answered by Lady 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think she looks great naked and pregnant.
2006-06-29 03:52:04 · answer #4 · answered by Timbo84 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i have no idea, but if its the same sort of deal that Demi Moore did when she was pregnant then she will look airbrushed to perfection with added "pregnancy glow" - very non real
2006-06-29 03:51:53 · answer #5 · answered by colletteukuk 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh very Sexy!
2006-06-29 04:12:28 · answer #6 · answered by Rabbit23girl 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO, But I don't think she looks sexy at all anyway.
2006-06-29 03:45:53 · answer #7 · answered by lostinlove 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
naked yes, pregnant no
2006-06-29 03:45:39 · answer #8 · answered by jmharley79 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not in real life only in a photo.
2006-06-29 03:46:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Too bloody right. I'd still put her to the sword
2006-06-29 03:48:26 · answer #10 · answered by Ape Hots 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋