2006-06-29 03:02:49 · 6 answers · asked by assad k 1 in Family & Relationships ➔ Other - Family & Relationships
I put a 2 yr gap in between my children so I didnt have 2 kids in diapers, but i didnt want to wait too long apart cause i wanted them to be able to play with eachother.
2006-06-29 03:06:53 · answer #1 · answered by caron c 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It takes 9 months to have one after you give birth.
Unless there are twins. Gaps are nice because
it gives you a little break. But obviously with the existence of
twins gaps are not totally necessary. I think research currently says that 3 years is the ideal spacing for all considerations (parents and siblings).
2006-06-29 10:06:08 · answer #2 · answered by BonesofaTeacher 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No its not. Its better for the kids to be around the same age so they can play together, you know be pals. It gives you a break and you wouldn't want to have to start all over from scratch again anyway.
2006-06-29 10:09:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
nope, but it probably be alot easier. Thinking about school fees etc
The burden would be less if u have the kids 6 years appart so that one leaves school when one enters school when the other is in middle school.
But age difference in the end does not matter, just look at families with twins, they were born just seconds appart... and they are going just fine.
2006-06-29 10:08:24 · answer #4 · answered by ? 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
9 or 10 months is very necessary
2006-06-29 10:06:22 · answer #5 · answered by giddy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not if you can handle the kids while they are young. I would rather do them right after each other, but I think it would be very tiring.
2006-06-29 10:05:42 · answer #6 · answered by jetskichick25 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋