Do you see any relationship between the subatomic microcosm and the macroscopic universe?

Answer 1

Quite a few. Here are some:
- stars shine because in their cores fusion reactions produce Helium from protons
- in supernovae enormous amounts of neutrinos are formed
- in the first three minutes after the Big Bang quarks condensed into protons and neutrons and the latter partly into deuterons and Helium
- if the fundamental forces were slightly stronger or weaker the universe would be very different. A slightly stonger weak nuclear force would imply hotter and faster burning stars.

Answer 2

I supposed that The nucleus, atom, electron is similar to the sun, solar system, planets. as these have definite orbit and it rotates and revolves around. This is the only relationship between the subatomic microcosm and the macroscopic universe

Answer 3

Atom diagrams often show electrons zipping around the nucleus of an atom in a similar way that planets orbit their sun. This is just for simplicities sake. Electrons can be more accurately thought of as being in a "cloud" around the nucleus and not an orbit. Depending on the energy state of an atom, its electrons can be at drastically varying positions around the nucleus.

Answer 4

Tes but only superficially. Electrons are often portrayed as orbiting the nucleus of the atom in circular orbits much as planets orbit the sun. Though in reality well i recommend u read a book called "The Elegant Universe"

Answer 5

It seems to me that they are entirely too similar, from what we understand. It makes perfect sense to me the universe is both infinitely large, and infinitely small. And our planet is something like an electron, a part of an atom, a part of a molecule, a part of.... etc etc.

Answer 6

the first one can be a part of the second one

Answer 7

No, none at all.