Are American presidential elections bought, does the campaign with the most money always win?

Question

Does the campaign with the most money win the election?

Answer 1

money is impotent and used as a tool to keep the average American that wants to do good for our country out of the election process.. remember money is power and with power you can do anything you want.. There will never be a poor president that runs our country be cause he would work for the people and all this money that's going out of our country would stop..
Very few people know all our congressmen up on arriving in DC are taken under the wing of an old congressmen and shown the ropes and told how to become millionaires if they block step with their party.. If they don't then they have a really hard time and their state get nothing done .. The minds to be make sure he is black balled and shown the door.. People trust politicians less than car salesmen.... and no they are not bought Just witched back and forth to create the impression they are doing something .. Remember at night when they go home they stop at the local drinking hole to throw back a few and joke about how they have gotten over on the American public...

Answer 2

Kerry had/has the most money directly available to him of anyone who ever ran for office. In this country, only one form the 2 major parties has a chance to win. As long as they both give use bad choices one chooses the better of the 2.

The electoral college is there so that the candidates can't just focus on the large cities to win.

Answer 3

It does look slightly attempting, inspite of the reality that we extremely make the alternative in some year and a a million/2. yet via fact the primaries are below a year away, those forms of pastimes inevitably happen. In some techniques, the parliamentary equipment works greater proper: the government calls the election (or ought to accomplish that once a undeniable volume of time), and balloting commonly occurs interior of two months. It avoids a brilliant number of this ongoing talk. yet certainly, i think of we like this form of coverage--despite if begrudgingly and/or secretly. that's uniquely (or is that pecularily?) American.

Answer 4

Thats a good question but I wouldnt disregaurd anything. This country is not a free election being that we still have electorial colleges deciding our vote. I beleive they should be banned.

Answer 5

no to both. money is important but not usually the deciding factor unless there is a huge difference between the two sides.

Answer 6

I don't think so, but I do think that they have made it so expensive to run that some one that would be a great president would not be able to afford to run. This way the very rich can continue to protect themselves.

Answer 7

well........you can't get your message to the people by spending a Wal-Mart paycheck. Sad but true.

Even the founding fathers (at the time of their power) were not represntative of the poor

Answer 8

No

Although, the more money you have to try and sway people's opinions, the better off you'll be.

Answer 9

money is important in races, but not necessarily that biggest factor. i think the plan of the candidates are more important.

Answer 10

Because $$ is power