English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

23 answers

Of course they were like every other loosing team was. That's why soccer sucks, the refereeing is so subjected and most of the player are frustrated want to be actors, acting like 6 year old girls on the field. What a worthless sport.

2006-06-29 01:20:06 · answer #1 · answered by skyyn777 5 · 0 0

yeah Ghana was unfairly treated by the referee during the match against Brazil if it was treated fairly the score would be only 1-0 not 3-0 because the other 2 goals were offsides!

2006-06-29 08:25:44 · answer #2 · answered by cute_girl 2 · 0 0

Ghana did not score; Brazil did 3 times. What else is there to say? It's football with all the imperfection of decisions made by human beings. All national football associations know this and compete under the rules of FIFA the governing body. No such thing as "unfair treatment".

2006-06-29 08:33:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The only complaint they may have had was the 2nd goal but the offside law is so complicated nowadays only the referee on the pitch can interpret it correctly. I thought the referee let Ghana away with some really dangerous tackling in the 2nd half. They probably learned it from Essien but he will soon be sorted out.

2006-06-29 09:11:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

yes they were unfairly treated but only once when Adriano put the ball in their goal post and he was clearly offside....except for that i dont think there was an issue....
even though they had more than 50 % of the goal pocession they never really threatened the Brazilians . Ghana really doesnt have quality strikers who could threaten Dida..
they were beaten fair and square by brazil !!!!!!

2006-06-29 08:44:00 · answer #5 · answered by johny harlow 2 · 0 0

Ghana just don't stand a chance against Brazil . Few teams do

2006-06-29 08:21:03 · answer #6 · answered by qbalka 1 · 0 0

yes the 2nd goal was unfairly given by the ref.

but ghana lost the match due to its own mistakes

2006-06-29 08:28:33 · answer #7 · answered by abhishek 2 · 0 0

No, they were not. One cannot debate and find excuses for a 3-goal difference. It could easily have been six or seven, incidentally. Enough of this debate.

BTW, "skyyyn", your remark is so ridiculous (real football is the only global sport there is), that I suggest you substitute the letters "cret" for the first two in your pseudonym.

Incidentally, you meant "subjective" instead of "subjected", didn't you? There are many remedial English courses available -- why don't you take one? That way, you could at least spout your inanities in good English.

2006-06-29 08:45:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i think it was,the refs in the tournament are taking it too far!! all african teams lost cs of bad decisions from the ref.its just dumb!! i mean,who gives out 3 yellow cards before a red??? not only that but there at least 4fifa officials on the pitch and none of them notice anything!!!Ghana tried their best even though its brazil,so did all other african teams. the problem is that the refs are wak!!

2006-06-29 08:25:29 · answer #9 · answered by The Prince of Laos 3 · 0 0

Yeah they were totally robbed.But thats football, it happens all the time. But don't worry funs of Ghana, the black stars will be back next four years on african soil.....Long live Ghana, long live the black stars!

2006-06-29 08:27:52 · answer #10 · answered by kevin 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers