Could George bush someday be charged with crimes against Humanity for personal gain.?

Question

I no what i think he has done wrong, but the real facts Im uncertain of.

hey people dont get mad at me I just wanted to know what you thought about the subject topic. Thanks

Answer 1

So here it is there has been no war crimes, If saving a country from a mad man who has slaughtered his own people with chemical weapons is a crime then what is helping humanity. Most of the civilian losses in the war are from the ignorance of the people- they stand outside during a firefight watching the battle (common sense says not to due that).

Lets see rebuilding schools, hospitals, power plants, water purification sites. Yea real war crimes there.

Medical attention to the population- another war crime in the making.

Gee if only the media would tell the People of the the World the real truth instead of the half truths that sell.

If anyone should be held responsible for war crimes it should be the media - just ask the 200 detainees who were killed because of the detainee abuse coverage- insurgent bombed a prison in Iraq as retaliation there's your war crimes.

Answer 2

the fact is that George Bush has not committed genocide, used chemical weapons, or mistreated POW's so no that is the stuff that is used for crimes against humanity so the answer is no
but the way people sue people now a days you could sue because was offended by his actions lol

Answer 3

I feel that one day George bush will be charged with crimes linked to his presidency not necessarily crimes against humanity unless they uncover 9/11 for what it truly was, but i feel he has helped his friends get fat rich with insider trading and giving big government contracts to his buddies!!

Answer 4

No, What do you think he is Personally gaining?...So you think what Saddam did was all-right?...What about it was so wrong, and don't tell me the troops are dying... I was one of them, and most of us have done more than one tour, and were willing to go back...Oil? Not even close...This War was simple Saddam has been f**king with us and his people for a long time now and someone had to have the balls to go over-there and kick his A**.

Answer 5

Of course not. He is trying to do what he, and most people in America, think is right. He has to make decisions with consideration of his constituents, and he has done just that. Most people (at first) wanted to see some action and payback for 9-11.

Answer 6

Probably not. It would be difficult to prove. Who would have the power to bring him to trial? At best one could argue ignorance. Outside of that, what personal gain has he reaped? He was rich before and he's rich now. What is his motive? Oil? He's been there done that in Texas.

Answer 7

in case you have faith that the international rules on the subject of habit in war and human rights ought to shop on with the two to each u . s . a ., then definite, he must be charged - that's especially glaring. The invasion of Iraq advance into no longer sanctioned by potential of the UN. It advance into consequently unlawful. additionally, we've all seen gross abuses of human rights in the process the occupation by potential of persons he's responsible for, and the resultant mess that has worsened the protection venture there. there is likewise a particular cost below international regulation for war profiteering which would be undemanding to coach, in case you have faith the war sceptics. even however, in case you have faith that GW invaded Iraq out of the goodness of his coronary heart to evade an escalation of fundamentalist effect interior the area, and he acted in stable faith to the intelligence on the time, then even however quite a few the charges might stick, a jury is going to be stressful to cajole approximately his motives. Addendum: "Disliking the chief of yet another u . s . a ." isn't a valid explanation for invading a rustic and killing hundreds interior the approach. by potential of the comparable good judgment, France might have had legitimacy in dropping a nuclear bomb on Washington in the process the previous 4 years. it rather is definitely sparkling that there advance into no possibility from Iraq until now the invasion, as Colin Powell shown in 2001 on an identical time as Iraq advance into below sanctions, until now the neocons have been given their claws into him. Feb twenty fourth 2001: "asked with regard to the sanctions placed on Iraq, that have been then below evaluation on the protection Council, Powell pronounced the measures have been working. in certainty, he added, "(Saddam Hussein) has no longer progressed any considerable potential with admire to weapons of mass destruction. he's unable to venture usual potential against his pals." As for people who, after all those years and concentration on the communicate, nonetheless hang to the fable with regard to the life of WMDs.....do no longer you think of the neo cons might scream and shout it from the rooftops if that they had even a tiny shred of evidence ? Republicans are so gullible, they in all probability nonetheless think of usa is going by way of a substances growth.

Answer 8

Putting the lives of American servicemen and allowing thousands of Iraqis told be killed in pursuant of oil and contracts.. YES

Answer 9

i don't think it's for personal gain

i still prefer to think he's doing wat he thinks is rite for america...even tho it's obviously not

and it'll be too hard for bush to get charged with the crime, even tho he's obviously committed crimes against humanity with the wars in afghanistan and iraq, as well as the issues about guantanemo bay

Answer 10

no never ... nobody in america especially their president will have to go through that ....