if the world was all homosexual, wouldn't that mark the end within a century or so? just a thought
2006-06-28
20:10:02
·
17 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Cultures & Groups
➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
but surely artificial semination would not be as effective as the mass reproduction process we have going on called sexual intercourse
after a while, the population would drop greatly
2006-06-28
20:16:59 ·
update #1
when i say a smaller population, i mean a REALLY small poulation
not many people in the world would want to take the "burden" of carrying a child for someone else
artificial semination is also way more difficult than natural semination
2006-06-28
20:28:03 ·
update #2
true, homosexuality is a form of population control, but so is murder
2006-06-28
20:37:12 ·
update #3
the only well thought out answer was from gabriel
although find many holes
for one, yes, there are gay people out there that have sex and have kids, but the fact is, most of them are like you: not willing to
and since most of our population comes from willimg parents, a world of unwilling people would harshly hurt the population and evetually, the end would come
if the whole world was gay, there would be way less willing people there to mate and soon, either the world would end, or it would be surviving off a strand of a few survivors
2006-06-28
21:12:22 ·
update #4
a population willing to mat with the opposite sex would be more effective than an unwilling population
if i had to have sex with a guy to maintain a strait population, i wouldn't do so
2006-06-28
21:28:44 ·
update #5
i luv my man and that all im sayin'
dont even want to think about it!!!!
2006-06-30 08:11:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
5⤋
Hey guy. If everyone was gay the population would be down but man+woman=baby. So a gay man and a gay woman are allowed to have sex. And if everyone was gay even unwilling people would do it. Are we talking if every straight person died or a world where everyone was born gay? If everyone was born gay then they would just get it done.
2006-06-28 21:22:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by korngoddess1027 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually before the homosexual livers reach 49% of the total population we will have several craft sailing to several new worlds where homosexuality will be banned for thousands of years again. After that the percentage will get higher but marriage will still exist to the end on this planet.
2006-06-29 06:39:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
As mentioned before, there's always artificial insemination. And what's wrong with a drop in population? The world's loaded with famine and disease. I think a drop in population would be good for the world. Ahh ... a world of homosexuals. What a wonderful place it would be!
2006-06-29 04:42:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
For starters, there's artificial insemination. Secondly, not all children raised by gay parents grow up to be gay. There would still be heterosexual people in the world. This was an ignorant question, one I've heard all too well and far too long.
2006-06-29 02:56:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Agent Double EL 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. The world has always maintained diversity throughout history, for one thing. There have always been straight, gay and unlabeled people around. I know plenty of gay people who have chosen to reproduce in our current world, so it would probably continue, even if the world's total population was gay.
2006-06-28 21:07:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Cub6265 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
The tough estimate is that 9.7% of the male inhabitants identifies as gay and four.5% of the female inhabitants identifies as lesbian. Counted over the completed inhabitants of the two adult males and girls human beings that would desire to quantity to approximately 7% of the inhabitants that identifies as gay. The numbers in user-friendly terms seem increasing. Homosexuality was once an unstated difficulty. human beings knew it existed, yet no person ever suggested it nor confirmed their sexuality in the event that they have been. cases have replaced and persons dare to be lots greater open approximately it, meaning that it kind of feels that there are greater gay human beings around. upload to that the media interest this is been entering into distinctive techniques, you have a seeming boost in gay human beings. yet i'm incredibly specific that the ratio has consistently been incredibly lots an identical.
2016-12-08 13:46:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by joto 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You have clearly never played "dodge the stroller" in your typical gay or lesbian neighborhood.
Preference for a same-sex relationship doesn't negate the desire or ability to reproduce.
So, for your hypothetical, no, we wouldn't run out of people. For reality, we're in no danger of running out of people. Along with many other families, gays are still building family by having children or adopting children.
2006-06-28 23:02:14
·
answer #8
·
answered by question_ahoy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Try reading The Wild Boys by William S Burroughs. If you can get through the Acid haze - you'll find an interesting take on your question.
2006-06-28 22:12:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by unclefrunk 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Honey, this will NEVER happen! But, if it did, as you think, who says the children that us gays produce, will turn out gay? And i know a lot of gay people lesbians and gay men who would be willing to have actual intercourse to make children! A friend of mine did it!
2006-06-29 15:13:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by munkypoo1 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
have you ever considered that homosexuals are a form of population control? there's too many people in the world already, we need more gay people.
2006-06-28 20:35:27
·
answer #11
·
answered by vampire_kitti 6
·
0⤊
0⤋