Why america doesnt make efforts to spread democracy and help helpless people instead of tyrants in countrieswhose leaders are rather kings never to step down(Eritrea,Ethiopia,Uganda,Egypt,.....more) ?
2006-06-28 18:15:45 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
probably china and england are two of the closest. the chinese have a lot of people and have revolutionized a lot of stuff liek technology. England is always a very powerful country.
2006-06-28 18:19:38 · answer #1 · answered by ddawg69 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in case you imagine about boom price, then China will guess next to u.s. or surpass u.s. in the close to destiny (10 - two decades or so). China has been in the double digit boom price for more advantageous than two decades. Now, i will answer your next question. It relies upon on "what do you recommend through democracy?" -- President Hu, Jingtao of China Do you imagine US is democratic? if you're saying "convinced", then that's the most important comic tale I easily have ever heard. per chance because you're American, you do not realize US hasn't ever been democratic on its regulations (besides the undeniable fact that the election is democratic). US is Captalism no longer Democracy, and maximum people get mixed up, because the authorities is attempting to fool their own voters. you need to verify extra about how different international places imagine people previously you commence putting forward "US is democratic". for my section, democracy is only too vaguely used through people. i'm Asian, and raised in Canada. i'd say there's a niche between US and some international places with dictatorship, yet I also imagine that there is a huge hollow between US and Canada when we talk about democracy. Researchers have shown that Canada is really way extra democratic than US, and democracy has gotten worse in the course of the last years in US. i imagine US authorities lacks ethics. they're the so-call "Capitalists" attempting to run this international through using rigidity, and that is so incorrect to bully different international places once you're enormous and strong. i'm no longer writting an essay the following. My end is China, India or Japan possibly even Russia will finally take over the administration. to boot, US isn't close being democratic between more desirable international places, and, for this reason, do not have any properly to invade and intervene with different international places inner affair. The above is my own opinion. No offence meant. after I verify with US or US authorities, i'm refering to the Republican authorities, no longer people.
2016-11-15 09:53:13 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Great Britain
2006-06-28 18:18:52 · answer #3 · answered by Metal 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Let us fight a duel - one at a time.
**** !! In an age like this - we still discuss power when we should discuss irradication of social ills.
May be we are yet not ready for this !!
2006-06-28 18:46:30 · answer #4 · answered by dont try 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
U.K maybe. The economy, system and armed forces.
No China. never ever. They do NOT know what is democracy.
They want Taiwan and southen islands yet.
China is obsoletism nation.
2006-06-28 18:26:04 · answer #5 · answered by bottle 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you got your question wrong... it should be "which powerful country comes next to China?"
Of course the answer is : India... all "brain" jobs in the US are being outsourced there
2006-06-28 18:19:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely nobody. Not without our help. (yes i'm looking at you, China).Not economically not militarilly. Without us NOone would stand!
2006-06-28 18:21:04 · answer #7 · answered by rockhardbeef 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
China, a whole lot of people and lots of money.
2006-06-28 18:17:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We can't save the whole world. I think we should mind our own business and save ourselves first.
2006-06-28 18:21:10 · answer #9 · answered by butrcupps 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
united kingdom
2006-06-28 18:18:43 · answer #10 · answered by merbaby30 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋