I have rented the wrong BBC movie in C.S. Lewis's Narnia series by mistake. I have "The Silver Chair" (the third of three movies) and have watched "The Lion, The Witch, and the Wardrobe," but I have no idea what happens in "Prince Caspian and the Voyage of the Dawn Treader". I've never read the series. Will "The Silver Chair" make sense anyway?
2006-06-28 17:24:05 · 4 answers · asked by saddison2004 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
It should be ok. There are a couple of references to things that have previously happened - but nothing that will throw you for a loop.
2006-06-28 17:27:42 · answer #1 · answered by Dr. Brian 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
What a super strawman you build right here. one thank you to construct a faux argument is to declare that yet somebody else argument grow to be designed in accordance with a minimum of a few thing that it grow to be on no account designed to tackle. and that's what you do right here. yet interestingly you're basically responding to particular Christians who use Lewis' argument for purposes it grow to be on no account meant for. Lewis made this argument against a definite variety of unbelief. It grow to be stated in accordance with those that believed Christ existed and that He grow to be certainly a spiritual logician and instructor of reliable ethics (the myth of the reliable Samaritan is composed of concepts) yet who reject the claims that he's God's unique Son or that he's God interior the flesh. the finished element to his argument is which you would be able to certainly call him a lunatic or a liar.. it is likewise possible to declare he did no longer exist! Lewis' argument isn't meant to tackle those in any respect! that's meant to tackle the declare that He existed as a reliable instructor purely. the element is that if Jesus existed and suggested the flaws appropriate interior the Gospel debts, then He could desire to no longer be basically a reliable instructor, or perchance a reliable instructor in any respect. an trouble-free reliable instructor would not make the claims Christ made approximately Himself, for in the event that they did, they could no longer be a reliable instructor. they could be the two a madman or a liar. In yet another classic spin on Lewis' element, a scholar of Lewis summed it up with an addition: "He grow to be the two a Liar, a Lunatic, a delusion or he's Lord... He can't be basically a reliable instructor." Get it? So in a tragic and setting up way, Lewis' argument particularly concurs with a number of what you're saying.
2016-12-14 03:09:29 · answer #2 · answered by nella 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
lord of the rings made sense without the hobbitt (which was actually written after the trilogy). if done right it will make sense. if not it will be like the 3rd harry potter movie where they left out all the info about harrys dad being an animorphous and why it was a big deal his "uncle" was....
2006-06-28 17:28:29 · answer #3 · answered by autumnl78 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It will make sense since you've seen the first but you should still watch them in order if you can!
Nice to see someone else caring about the BBC version!
2006-06-28 17:28:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous Evil Chick 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋