According to an article I read in the local newspapers, this often happens at the time of boarding, and in some cases, a person will be flying round trip, and have no problems on the first flight, but then be required to pay for a second seat in order to return home. The reason given was that other passengers are uncomfortable sitting beside a large person. However, I think if big people should have to buy a seat for other passenger's comfort, so should other people you don't want to sit beside(young children, smelly people, annoying people who won't stop talking, snorers, etc), and only requiring it of big people is discriminatory. Opinions?
2006-06-28
16:36:45
·
13 answers
·
asked by
skelley99
1
in
Politics & Government
➔ Other - Politics & Government
Doesn't that just happen if they dont think the person will fit in one seat with the arm rests put down?...
What else can they do? Make bigger seats for bigger people? That could be considered discriminatory too.
2006-06-28 16:41:14
·
answer #1
·
answered by Shaina 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh please! You apparently have never sat next to a "Person of Size" for 4 hours where they're halfway sitting in your seat as well as their own. You're scrunched up against the window or arched over the armrest into the isle because he/she is in the middle and to top it off, this "P.O.S." is sweating like a pig (no pun intended). Have you been the Flight Attendant going up & down the isle, balancing a full tray of drinks & snacks to the passengers while this person is sitting in the isle seat & trying to squeeze by him/her? Probably not. I have! I've been that squished passenger. I am that Flight Attendant. These airlines dont wait til the customer's last "leg" of their trip to squeeze more money out of them. If the flight is full then that cust. is asked to pay for an extra seat so they can comfortably "flow" over into that seat then they & the passengers around them can fly in comfort.
2006-06-28 16:54:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Spoo 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
i do think it is discrimination, however the airlines should have a policy stated in advance of purchasing tickets. they have a size in inches for the luggage , just post on the websites and on all contracts a person size chart. if you are more than a certain inches/cm at hips/waist etc..you will be required to buy 2 seats to travel. the fact that they do not state it anywhere and then expect the person to have the extra funds is unfair. the person who has to sit next to the obese person is not getting a fair deal either.
2006-06-28 16:52:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by j_ardinger 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Why should I be made uncomfortable with some fat *** taking over my seat and smooshing me. Besides that, fat people weigh more and thus require more fuel on board to carry them because of the amount of weight a plane can carry. I take up one seat, and pay one price. I'd love a double seat for free to be comfortable. So the question should be, "Should normal people get bigger seats on the plane and be charged, when fat people should get them for free?"
2006-06-28 16:42:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by puppyfred 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It may be discrimination to an extent but I think it`s a necessity,for the traveling comfort of all concerned I think they should purchase an extra ticket,some people do it just so they can lay flat on international flights,I have been squashed up against the window for hours and on long flights it leads to frustration and anger its not a pleasant environment to travel in.
2006-06-28 16:44:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by aminuts 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
On a flight you are paying for a space on that plane. When your size is such that there isn't enough space for someone else to comfortably occupy the adjoining space, then yes you should pay extra. This country is too accomodating to the overweight people. We need to not give in to feelings of these people, they just need a slap in the face to point out they have a problem.
2006-06-28 16:44:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by nukecat25 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
this question receives debated all around the web on a number of forums. I wish the airways would get busy and do something about the priority. My opinion: Have some more advantageous-huge seats obtainable in coach -- possibly 2 of them the position 3 seats would typically be. change 0.5 lower back the cost of a unmarried seat. position them in route of the decrease back of the airplane. so as that persons of wide-spread weight does no longer be tempted to order those seats only for his or her own convenience. If an overweight individual arrives on the airplane and would't in good structure conveniently in his or her assigned commonplace seat, have them bypass to a tremendous seat, requiring a classic-weight individual to bypass out of it if necessary and billing/crediting the version in fares. some couples who're both overweight purchase 3 adjacent seats, raise the armrests, and sit down so as that they both spill over onto the middle seat. They manage the seat belts to in good structure, now and again by seat-belt extenders. If overweight passengers are going to be required to pay more advantageous to fly, they ought to receive the roomier seats they favor. i imagine it really is intense time the airways carried out that, short of creating them fly in intense priced good notch seats.
2016-11-15 09:47:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hi, I think that huge people should pay for one seat, and then half of mine if he/she is sitting next to me. Also, stinky people should get free Fragrance spray, Children more toys, and snorers a bag for their heads. Oh, and talkers, well, carry a rag.
2006-06-28 16:44:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by gypsyworks 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's not discrimination if you require two seats to fit yourself in to purchase both seats. You are paying for the space you use. That's fair.
2006-06-28 16:43:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by Mike R 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oftentimes bigger people need two seats because they cannot fit into one.
If a normal-sized person paid for a whole seat, shouldn't they be allowed to have a whole seat without sharing it with somebody who cannot fit into their own? I think so.
2006-06-28 16:42:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jill W 4
·
0⤊
0⤋