Here's a theory, maybe the government is using the media. Knowing they will report everything they hear, the government claims tactics they will use against terrorism which are actually false. The terrorist sects read this and change their tactics, maybe making it easier for us to catch them
2006-06-28 16:35:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by jason g 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
There not endangering lives. Bush endangered lives by not reading the presidential daily brief that said on the front "BIN LADEN DETERMINED TO STRIKE U.S". He admitted he never read it.
As for the press reporting on more George Bush scare tactics. I have heard an awful lot about nut case conservative newspapers (like the wall street journal) who reported the same thing.
But whenever Bush screws up or does something stupid it's never "hey Bush is a little stupid", It's always the media's fault.
If Bush really cared about our lives we would be in Afghanistan hunting down the man who was behind the 9/11 attacks. Not having American lives killed in Iraq because Saddam may or may not have W.M.D's which Bush and Rumsfeld probable gave to him in the 1980's.
And I'm glad the press released this story. Bush is a nutcase who keeps taking away our freedoms and privacy's by saying "I have to it's national security" .Every terrorism expert says the same thing. Al-Qaeda doesn't use phones because several years ago they knew we had the capability to listen in on there calls. And Al-Qaeda has there money hidden over sea's in secret accounts, not in America.
If you want to know about the scare tactics Bush is using and laugh your *** off at the same time than go to prisonplanet.com, than click on seven morons in a warehouse, than click to watch the daily show trailer.
2006-06-28 16:49:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The story was also reported in The Wall Street Journal (a VERY conservative editorial board) at the same time. How do you explain that?
Who leaked the information, was it a liberal? No.
Who betrayed the President more--the "liberal" media (please) or the members of his administration that have leaked classified information? Do you think the New York Times has access to anything it wants?
Try thinking these things through a little more before you decide to spout off.
2006-06-28 16:31:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by m137pay 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The media is trying to point out how our government is breaking the law. It's their job and they been asleep at the wheel for a long time.
And I love this Liberal Media baloney. The media puts out the news that it thinks will get the most viewers. Conservatives label anything Liberal that is contrary to what they want to believe.
"people willing to trade their freedom for temporary security deserve neither and will lose both"
2006-06-28 16:32:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by KERMIT M 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
They're not really. The things that you call security tactics are a gradual erosion of the liberties our forefathers fought for. Just because the people in power say that you should trust them doesn't mean that you should. Today they say they are only investigating islamic terrorists. Who will it be tomorrow -- or more likely -- who are they acting against now that you/we don't know about.
2006-06-28 16:40:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by Rat6skii 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
You must be talking about SWIFT as exposed by the NY Times, LA Times and WSJ. A better question might be: Why is the govt. attacking only the NY Times? or Why are you falling for this crap? or Why do I repeat everything FOX news tells me as fact without even changing the words?
2006-06-28 19:03:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Weatherman 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
How dare they actually report the news. This is the USSR ...er I mean USA, they can't report anything they want. Where were the censors when this happened.
BTW, the NYT agenda is to sell newspapers. If you think anything more than that you are a moron.
2006-06-28 16:38:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by beren 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
each American is damage by unlawful Immigrants being right here. they do no longer ought to mug you,yet they are going to. they do no longer ought to rob your position,yet they are going to. they do no longer ought to get inebriated and run over your little ones,yet they are going to. a really great percentage of them in spite of everything have little or no recognize for the regulation,why might want to they,we do not punish them for the guidelines they have already damaged so why no longer wreck extra? yet once you look on the depressing of wages,unpaid taxes on paintings finished contained in the U. S.,identity robbery,welfare fraud,growing to be crime prices,eroding colleges etc. Then we are each of the victims of unlawful Immigration,hence we'd want to all sue. ad
2016-11-29 22:57:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by cornn 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because they can't help them selves. Kind of like the minority person plating the race card when they are down.
Dam folks we all know Bush isn't the sharpest tool in the shed but why do you HATE him so?
2006-06-28 16:32:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by brad 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because they don't want the current government to connect the dots. Unless we get attacked again. Then they'll go back to their "why didn't the government protect us?" headlines.
2006-06-28 17:31:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by angrygramma 3
·
0⤊
0⤋