English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-06-28 16:09:52 · 10 answers · asked by christine2550@sbcglobal.net 2 in Politics & Government Politics

10 answers

This is what the white house is conducting against our own people, ignoring the constitution and creating more and more means of sying on us and curtailing our freedom. They call it the war on terrorism.

Remember when jerry Brown ran for president, he warned us of this

2006-06-28 16:15:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

I would love to answer this but myself I`m just as confused as you because I have been hearing about the war to protect our freedom seems like eternity and I know it can`t be Communism again I think that wore out with the excuse for the Vietnam War,Terrorism is fashionable but after Iraq and the Middle East conflict in general it will be interesting to finally maybe get to the bottom of the answer to you pertinent question.

2006-06-28 23:20:12 · answer #2 · answered by aminuts 4 · 0 0

Bush challenges hundreds of laws
President cites powers of his office

By Charlie Savage, Globe Staff | April 30, 2006

WASHINGTON -- President Bush has quietly claimed the authority to disobey more than 750 laws enacted since he took office, asserting that he has the power to set aside any statute passed by Congress when it conflicts with his interpretation of the Constitution.

Among the laws Bush said he can ignore are military rules and regulations, affirmative-action provisions, requirements that Congress be told about immigration services problems, ''whistle-blower" protections for nuclear regulatory officials, and safeguards against political interference in federally funded research.

Legal scholars say the scope and aggression of Bush's assertions that he can bypass laws represent a concerted effort to expand his power at the expense of Congress, upsetting the balance between the branches of government. The Constitution is clear in assigning to Congress the power to write the laws and to the president a duty ''to take care that the laws be faithfully executed." Bush, however, has repeatedly declared that he does not need to ''execute" a law he believes is unconstitutional.

Former administration officials contend that just because Bush reserves the right to disobey a law does not mean he is not enforcing it: In many cases, he is simply asserting his belief that a certain requirement encroaches on presidential power.

But with the disclosure of Bush's domestic spying program, in which he ignored a law requiring warrants to tap the phones of Americans, many legal specialists say Bush is hardly reluctant to bypass laws he believes he has the constitutional authority to override.

2006-06-28 23:47:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The liberal agenda.

•attack American traditions, specifically Christian traditions and the traditional American family
•engage in "get-even" policies that support discrimination when it benefits historically disadvantaged groups
•punish and/or discourage achievement through taxation and fiscal policies
•use the rulings of the Judicial branch of the government as de facto law, irrevocable by anything short of Constitutional amendment or a future court ruling, thus bypassing the legislative process. Roe V. Wade is the most frequently cited example of "judicial activism".
•weaken the military strength and morale of the country by vilifying the practice of armed combat and hesitating to use force when it appears necessary
•use regulatory bodies over private enterprise to accomplish social goals and restrict competition (government, education, labor)
•establish secular and progressive social policy, including support for gay marriage, abortion, liberal drug policy, euthanasia and prostitution legalization.
•implement a foreign policy supporting the protection of human rights and multiculturalism through activism and social intervention.

Things That Make Liberals Feel Uncomfortable.

Men who open doors for women
Women who intend to get married and have children
Women who where dresses, especially pink ones
SUV’s
Mentioning race in any context
Ann Coulter
Country Music
Mentioning Religion in any context
People who use the word “sin” and not “f***”
Men who where cowboy hats and/or boots
Carl Rove
Tax cuts
Rush Limbaugh
Personal Accountability
The 2nd Amendment
George W. Bush

2006-06-28 23:15:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Normally you would think this was Liberal hyperbole...but it spews from the mouths of conservatives. Today's conservatives sound more Liberal than Liberals with all their spreading freedom baloney.

What's the world coming to when conservatives can't be trusted to be conservative? I mean where does conservative end and liberal begin...oh that's right ...at the desire to use common sense. Now I remember.

2006-06-28 23:22:00 · answer #5 · answered by KERMIT M 6 · 0 0

i thought we had the freedom to bomb..isn't a expression...
Oh no wait, you mean I can't kill people cuz I am pissed...wrong country...
What the hell moron what do you think it is...
Our freedom to move about freely with out fear...how about that.

2006-06-28 23:25:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anthony G 4 · 0 0

The Right wind neo con agenda against the liberal media.

2006-06-28 23:27:23 · answer #7 · answered by s_k_latif 3 · 0 0

Have you forgotten when those towers fell? Our homeland under fire, going thru a living hell. And they say we souldn't worry 'bout Bin Laden. Have you fogotten?

2006-06-28 23:17:24 · answer #8 · answered by tomboy_jess_08 1 · 0 0

Bush vs US

2006-06-28 23:21:43 · answer #9 · answered by Who cares 5 · 0 0

Bush's morals and values!

2006-06-28 23:12:44 · answer #10 · answered by Truth Seeker 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers