English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I believe they were featured lately on shows like 60 Minutes and Dr Phil.. I want to report someone to them who I believe may pose a threat to children..

2006-06-28 15:10:47 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Computers & Internet Internet

OOO thanks its that one - Perverted Justice

2006-06-28 15:16:37 · update #1

8 answers

perverted justice

2006-06-28 15:12:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

1

2016-06-12 08:45:32 · answer #2 · answered by Gustavo 3 · 0 0

There are several. Here are a few I've dealt with in the past:

Child Protection Agency
http://www.find-missing-children.org/

Adult Sites Against Child Pornography
http://www.asacp.org/index.php

But check my source link for International Listings. If the offense occurs on Yahoo!, you can contact them via the TOS website.

2006-06-28 15:16:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

properly, as much as I do sense for you interior the undeniable fact that it fairly is your brother and which you of course love him very plenty (as you should), you should placed those little ones first. You particularly actually ought to enable somebody comprehend what that's which you think of he's approximately to do. attempt to get him to flow to somebody himself, in case you are able to, and ask for help. The acts that those human beings devote are appalling and hurtful and disgusting, yet in actuality they choose severe psychological help. Throwing them right into a reformatory inhabitants to be crushed and raped by way of their fellow inmates could look an suitable payback on the exterior, yet whilst they get out it has purely made the situation worse, as they have been victimized themselves. Your brother could have been "happier" in reformatory because of the undeniable fact that he grow to be being rid of his guilt by using this punishment in a sick variety of way, and the undeniable fact that he could desire to no longer be uncovered to being around little ones. This, besides the fact that, would not fix the situation and that they gained't shop him there continuously. additionally, maximum molesters have been as quickly as victims of molestation themselves. The very toddler that your brother victimized could very properly finally end up doing this somebody else as an grownup. The cycle must be broken right here. Castration and removal of the intercourse rigidity would not artwork, because of the fact this could be a psychological difficulty concerning capability, administration, and adolescence subject concerns, no longer sexual success itself. you have got himself castrated, and adult men have performed this attempting to end those urges, and it did no longer something. They nonetheless had palms, and the means to psychologically rigidity the youngsters into doing issues to themselves, one yet another, and so on. One would not desire a intercourse organ to sexually abuse. I exceedingly advise that folk watch the movie The Woodsman starring Kevin Sir Francis Bacon. that's from the point of view of the molester, after being released from reformatory. you would be shocked who you're hoping for on the top of this movie. i am going with to advise attempting to get him severe therapy now till now he commits this crime lower back. If he does certainly do some thing, turn him in and get him a criminal expert which will push for institutionalization as a replace of incarceration. Blessed Be and reliable success to you.

2016-12-14 03:06:53 · answer #4 · answered by berna 3 · 0 0

u can report that right online you know , at any child protection web site

2006-06-28 15:23:59 · answer #5 · answered by jojo 6 · 0 0

call the local police

2006-06-28 15:13:51 · answer #6 · answered by G. M. 6 · 0 0

why so you can set up an entrapement?
http://www.geocities.com/eadvocate/issues/index.html

2006-06-29 12:58:30 · answer #7 · answered by nk_rso 3 · 0 0

We are way too easy on those who decide to abuse children. Here is my answer to these people who abuse our loved ones
Sex Offender Legislation “Wish List”
1-GPS and lifetime supervision/treatment Law The failure of today's solutions regarding sexual offenders is because we are stuck in the strategy of “public notification” rather than “controlling offenders”. The current model puts the burden on parents rather than offenders, and makes the wrong people work to prevent abuse. Remotely (GPS) knowing where an offender is at all times throughout his lifetime can help to prevent that offender from creating new cases of sexual abuse.
2-Include all known offenders in the management plan-for life. It is wrong to include just those under supervision since the Meagan’s Law was written. People do not ever age out of this behavior so why an old is charge less important than a new charge. Sexual offences are the most under reported crimes (according to the FBI). The fact that a molester has not been arrested recently does not necessarily means he has not offended. In my opinion all offenders should be included in any plan, regardless of when their offense occurred. I believe some states have done this already.
3-Put all offenders , levels I, II or III on the website . I believe Florida does this. The leveling tool is very poor and pedophiles often end up with only a level I because they did not use force, and they superficially complied with treatment. The way the leveling system works pedophilic “groomers” who do not use force (and are the most busy of all offenders with hundreds of victims) are often not level III’s and therefore are able to have their offense relatively unknown. In New York for example offenders can lawyer up and reduce the “level” they get at their hearing. Molesters can assert they are “non violent”, “sober”, ect, and get the “points” reduced or get the judge to “override” the scale. Currently the public notification system is failing. All offenders of all levels should be on the website.
4- “Victim Shield Law”. As you know one of the few protections we offer rape victims is “Rape shield laws”, in order to at least try and prevent a rape victim’s sexual history from being put on trial rather than the rapist. In child sexual abuse cases there are no “Rape shield laws” to prevent the victim, or the victim’s family (often the mother) from being made the center of negative attention. In the past defense lawyers for rapists would portray rape victims as promiscuous, today child molester’s lawyers portray victims and victim’s mothers as manipulative, litigious, unreliable, angry, mentally ill, sociopathic, medicated, or undedicated. Because we as a society love to blame women, especially mothers, molesters have been able to harness the misogyny in our culture in order to escape responsibility for their offences. Like the old rape cases that would revolve around the victims sexual past, today molester cases revolve around a child or a mother’s real or fictional problems instead of the focus of attention being the sexual abuse committed by the offender. I do not know if there can ever be a “victim shield law” to prevent the victim/victim’s mother being put on trial rather than the molester, but I know it would help victims avoid being re-traumatized in the system and help society hold sexual offenders accountable. One of the things to always remember with offenders is they are control seekers, and will take any opportunity to attack rather than just defend. They feel entitled to their behavior and see being held accountable as an injustice they are being forced to suffer, and they have zero guilt in harming any number of people (even their children) in order to escape the consequences they deserve.
5-Plea deals down to “Endangering the welfare of a minor”. Despite the underlying behavior being the sexual abuse of children offenders are often given convictions that hide the nature of their behavior. When this happens offenders can get employment that gives them access to children, offenders are not on the State Sex Offender Registry. The other consequence to their being given non-sexual charges is that it cuts their supervision time in half. Misdemeanor sex offences carry 6 years probation supervision but “Endangering the welfare of a minor” carries only three. I feel the law should be changed so offenders cannot be given non-sexual abuse charges.
6-Make “Endangering the welfare of a minor” registerable , if the judge feels it was a sexually motivated crime. The registry is to narrow and limited as to what crimes can be registered. Laws be changed so “endangering the welfare of a minor” is registerable when the behavior or motivation was sexual.
7-“Standardized” conditions for those on sex offender probation. Right now offenders with good lawyers can get specific (or all) sex offender conditions removed from their sexual offender conditions of probation. This means that sexual offenders are on probation but are allowed to drink alcohol, work with children, have computers, go to bars, and do other things that will create a higher risk for the community. I feel there should be a “Statewide Sex Offender Conditions of Probation” that conditions cannot be removed from (but conditions can be added to suite the offenders issues).
8-Sexual Offender Contraband law- Strangely it is legal for sexual offenders off probation to own all kinds of things such as handcuffs, police lights, spy cameras, and software to make their internet behavior more anonymous.
9-Sex Offender use of technology law- When bank robbers use technology such as wearing body armor the penalties are increased, why are sex offender allowed to use any technology without added consequences. Offenders choose the internet because it allows greater access to children and greater anonymity. They should be punished for use of technology to harm a child. (technology such as Computers, digital cameras, webcams, ect)
10-“Secrecy Bind Law” The offender getting his victim to not report the crime he committed should be a separate crime that he suffers added consequences for. The pain that a victim suffers because the offender threatened, tricked, or manipulated the victim into silence should be seen as a separate and deserving of added consequences.
11- “Parental Alienation Syndrome” is a pseudo syndrome that is being used to get offenders off the hook by saying (incorrectly) that sexual abuse allegations come from a manipulative ex- playing head games with a child rather than because the child was actually molested. This “Parental Alienation Syndrome” is not a legitimate disorder, has not been subjected to peer review, has been ignored for 20 years by the APA, AMA, NASW, ECT because it is just a sophisticated way to say your wife is crazy and turned everyone against you. It is being pushed by hired guns such as Doctors, PhD’s, and lawyers to get their child molesting clients out of trouble. It is a favorite of the “Fathers Rights” groups who see men as victims of the Family Court system. By the way, these “Fathers rights” groups, “wrongly accused” groups, and “victims of allegations” groups are very organized and spend a good deal of time and energy networking and paying professionals. These angry, entitled molesters are organized and work hard, and I feel we need to work just as hard against them.

2006-06-29 01:52:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers