I think it was you!
Are you still mad at good ole Ted cause he cheated on you?
Get over it and move on!!
You gay hippie!
2006-07-01 06:32:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
The angel Gabriel stated me in Aug. 1973 that Jimmy Carter is the Anti-chist and that he is going to modify his call and divorce his better half! Obama is going to die first and then the Anti-christ who grew to become into between the previous 7 Presidents will take his place! Rev. 17:10 And there are seven kings: 5 are fallen, and one is, [and] the a number of isn't yet come; and on an identical time as he cometh, he could desire to proceed a short section. those 7 kings have been; one million. Gerald Ford 2. Jimmy Carter 3. Ronald Reagan 4. George H. W. Bush 5. invoice Clinton 6. George W. Bush.... is spoken of interior the present annoying (and one is) by way of fact till at last Reagan died all 7 have been alive! 7. Barack Obama.......and one is yet lower back! he will die some days after he will advance taxes! Obama is likewise in Dan. eleven:20 Then shall upward thrust up in his components a raiser of taxes [in] the consideration of the dominion: yet indoors of few days he could be destroyed, neither in anger, nor in conflict. Rev. 17:eleven And the beast that grew to become into, and is not any longer, even he's the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition.
2016-12-14 03:06:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by berna 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No telling, hope they go to prison the rest of their lives. Even the Democrats were raising Cain on this leak. No one on either side thinks this is illegal. These leaks need to stop, there is an over site committee and other avenues for people to take if they have issues with secret programs, whining to the news is not how secret programs are handled.
How would it have been if on June 4th, 1944 the NY times had this headline "Allies Pull Big Switcharoo, Invasion Actually Going to be at Normandy!". National intelligence policy is decided by our elected leaders, not disgruntled employees.
2006-06-28 15:19:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by JFra472449 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
First of all, any one with half a brain would know that the US of A would be tracing bank records, including terrorists, so the story should not have come as a big surprise to anyone.
2nd of all, do you really think bush, rove, & company are entitled to any slack on this issue. They're the ones who have gotten us into this Iraq debacale. If the press was a little more aggressive back before the war, maybe we wouldn't be in this situation.
2006-06-28 15:09:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Pitcairn357 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
FROM ANN COULTER:
Maybe treason ended during the Vietnam War when Jane Fonda sat laughing and clapping on a North Vietnamese anti-aircraft gun used to shoot down American pilots. She came home and resumed her work as a big movie star without the slightest fear of facing any sort of legal sanction.
Fast forward to today, when New York Times publisher "Pinch" Sulzberger has just been named al-Qaida's "Employee of the Month" for the 12th straight month.
Before the Vietnam War, this country took treason seriously.
But now we're told newspapers have a right to commit treason because of "freedom of the press."
But freedom of the press does not mean the government cannot prosecute reporters and editors for treason — or for any other crime. The First Amendment does not mean Times editor Bill Keller could kidnap a child and issue his ransom demands from The New York Times editorial page. He could not order a contract killing on the op-ed page. Nor can he take out a contract killing on Americans with a Page One story on a secret government program being used to track terrorists who are trying to kill Americans.
What if, instead of passing information from the government's secret nuclear program at Los Alamos directly to Soviet agents, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg had printed those same secrets in a newsletter? Would they have skated away scot-free instead of being tried for espionage and sent to the death chamber?
Tokyo Rose was convicted of treason for a single remark she made on air: "Orphans of the Pacific, you really are orphans now. How will you get home now that your ships are sunk?" For that statement alone, she spent six years in prison and was fined $10,000 (more than $80,000 in today's dollars).
The federal statute on treason, 18 USC 2381, provides in relevant part: "Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States ... adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000."
2006-06-28 15:38:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
people need to shut up about the free press b.s. This is not a matter of free press. This is a matter of someone releasing top secret information, which has already been run by the representatives who were sworn to secrecy. If there was any doubt as to the legality of it, it could have been discussed.
To break your oath, and release top secret, security information is called treason!
2006-06-28 16:14:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The citizens of the United States have a FREE PRESS. It is there duty to inform us that our government has overstepped it's authority and now uses every opportunity to spy on its own citizens. The New York Times knows this President and John Snow of the Trains have overstepped their authority and they did right in informing us of just how far they have gone lately.
2006-06-28 14:53:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by matthewdeanandrews 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Personally I'm glad we have the press around to make sure the country isn't taken over by a totalitarian regime. The press keeps politicians honest. (Well as honest as they're going to get.) Freedom of the press is integral to a working democracy.
2006-06-28 15:27:05
·
answer #8
·
answered by trailerparkprincess85 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Gee, it could have been George Bush himself when he announce at a news conference in 2002 that he was going to track the funding through international sources. By the way, al Quaeda moved their money from banks to diamonds during the Clinton administration so it does no good to track them through banks.
2006-06-28 14:54:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by Jim T 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh no! What did we do? Tell what George Bush is actually doing? Why would somebody want to do that! Especially 'cause the people from his own country knows his nonsense! Wow! Those guys ARE bad! Grow a spine.
2006-06-28 14:55:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by swimmerboy8900 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Kennedy, Durbin, Reid, Pelosi, Boxer, Feinstein, Voinavitch,
Kusnich, (SIC), Kerry, Murtha, ETC ETC
2006-06-28 14:52:35
·
answer #11
·
answered by Vagabond5879 7
·
0⤊
0⤋