English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

This is a question that will live in infamy.

2006-06-28 14:33:29 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

26 answers

What's wrong with this country. Usually when you buy your verdict you don't have a bunch of haters second guessing the outcome trying to bring a brotha down.

2006-06-28 14:38:11 · answer #1 · answered by bones54 3 · 2 0

Yes,O.J. did it. I'm a Afro-American.
Whether he was acquitted or not don't mean a thing because he was sued later and her family won! The only reason why he was acquited wasn't because of fame (Good football player but bad actor) but Johnny Cochran,(my hero for as the famous civil rights lawyer-R.I.P.) because of his infamous statement "If the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit" or something to that effect.

2006-06-28 14:43:58 · answer #2 · answered by Pashur 7 · 0 0

Of Course he did. Just because he's OJ he got off. It's amazing what a few dollars will do.

2006-06-28 14:37:26 · answer #3 · answered by Stacy R 6 · 0 0

YES YES YES he did it!
the gloves he wore were the exact pair his wife bought for him and they didnt fit cuz leather SHRINKS when it is saturated with water ( or BLOOD for that matter) and plus- IF he did not do it ( and again i say he DID) then what in the name of all that is holy was he doing with Kato Kaylin drivn garound saying hed kill himself in his white SUV??????????? use your brains ppl- he had enough $$ to influence the system.
there are also many innocent ppl in prison ondeath row who dont have the $$ to prove thier innocence. what a world we live in!

2006-06-28 14:41:41 · answer #4 · answered by Charmed 4 · 0 0

i think OJ is innoncent. from the documentaries i have seen, how can u drive a couple of blocks, murder the mother of your kids, then get into a limosuine, and catch a plane.
impossible.
he couldnt have done it.

2006-06-28 14:38:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

he's not determined purely grasping. HE CLAIMS THAT the money HE gained FROM the strengthen ON THAT e book WENT INTO have self assurance money FOR HIS little ones and then HE stated HE PAID OFF HIS domicile. that is BLOOD money AND HE seems PROUD HE were given AWAY WITH homicide. that is amazingly unhappy yet he will have ONE prefer to respond to TO THAT knows the real answer....GOD AND HE won't be able to conceal FROM HIM.

2016-11-29 22:50:15 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Of course he did it. He just bought off everyone at the trial. Money talks!

2006-06-28 14:37:06 · answer #7 · answered by broncosfan1730 2 · 0 0

Yes.

2006-06-28 14:36:18 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes; I believe he is guilty of murder.

He was acquitted at his murder trial, but not in the civil trial; at the civil trial he was found culpable and liable, I believe.

2006-06-28 14:39:43 · answer #9 · answered by silvercomet 6 · 0 0

Of course, but the guy have excellent lawyers.

2006-06-28 14:39:05 · answer #10 · answered by Lost. at. Sea. 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers