2006-06-28 13:23:02 · 8 answers · asked by Tina Who Care For Everybody 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Maybe this will help just read all the way down or at least the last 10 or so sentences
VERY INTERESTING-
1.The Garden of Eden was in Iraq.
2. Mesopotamia, which is now Iraq, was the cradle of civilization!
3. Noah built the ark in Iraq.
4. The Tower of Babel was in Iraq
5. Abraham was from Ur, which is in Southern Iraq!
6. Isaac's wife Rebekah is from Nahor, which is in Iraq!
7. Jacob met Rachel in Iraq.
8. Jonah preached in Nineveh - which is in Iraq.
9. Assyria, which is in Iraq, conquered the ten tribes of Israel.
10. Amos cried out in Iraq!
11. Babylon, which is in Iraq, destroyed Jerusalem.
12. Daniel was! In the lion's den in Iraq!
13. The three Hebrew children were in the fire in Iraq (Jesus had been in Iraq also as the fourth person in the Fiery furnace!)
14. Belshazzar, the King of Babylon saw the "writing on the wall" in Iraq.
15. Nebuchadnezzar, King of Babylon, carried the Jews captive into Iraq.
16. Ez ekiel preached in Iraq.
17. The wise men were from Iraq
18. Peter preached in Iraq.
19. The "Empire of Man" described in Revelation is called Babylon, which was a city in Iraq!
And you have probably se en thi s one. Israel is the nation most often mentioned in the Bible. But do you know which nation is second? It is Iraq! However, that is not the name that is used in the Bible The names used in the Bible are Babylon, Land of Shinar, and Mesopotamia . The word Mesopotamia means between the two rivers, more exactly between the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers. The name Iraq, means country with deep roots.
Indeed Iraq is a country with deep roots and is a very significant country in the Bible.
No other nation, except Israel, has more history and prophecy associated it than Iraq.
And also, This is something to think about!
Since America is typically represented by an eagle. Saddam should have read up on his Muslim passages...
The following verse is from the Koran,
(the Islamic Bible)
Koran (9:11 ) - For it is written that a son of Arabia would awaken a fearsome Eagle. The wrath of the Eagle would be felt throughout the lands of Allah and lo, while some of the people trembled in despair still more rejoiced; for the wrath of the Eagle cleansed the lands of Allah;
And there was peace.
(Note the verse number!) Hmmmmmmm?!
This is a ribbon for soldiers fighting in Iraq.
2006-07-02 15:11:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
We do not leave Iraq because the Iraqi people are not strong
enough to stop the country from reverting back to its original form
of government and our government will not take the chance of
losing control of the oil. Our move into the middle east is permanent. No other country will take this responsibility.
2006-06-28 13:40:24 · answer #2 · answered by larrysmind 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because America has a massive petro-chemical addiction [it's like crack except that nearly EVERYONE is hooked, whether they know it or not].
If we withdraw now, we will lose control of significant oil reserves due to the instability of Iraq's current political situation & the powers-that-be don't like that idea very much, as it cuts into their profits. The only reason we're over there is to secure these assets for our military-industrial complex. Truman warned us after WW2, but we didn't listen...now we're paying the price.
2006-06-28 13:38:23 · answer #3 · answered by Zac 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the Government is still very unstable, just like the ones down in Africa that are having mutiple people trying to take over the government.
I think it would be rude of us to leave the government instable, then people would blaim it on us, because we left the country.
2006-06-28 13:31:52 · answer #4 · answered by khstennis01 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the government that they elected... isn't quite the one we wanted them to elect... and even though Rumsfeld likes to gloat about all the Iraqi troops they have trained (250,000 I think I heard him say last)... they clearly don't trust them to take over the security... if they do have 250,000... that should be more than enough in a country that size?
2006-06-28 13:36:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the answer is Insurgents (sp?)
The iraqi govmt itsnt equipped to deal with the threats of extremests by themselves yet.
2006-06-28 13:26:57 · answer #6 · answered by Jordan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they cant do that yet , thier just babies still. do you leave a baby on its own , noway . if we did that guess whod be comming after us , an angry iraqi mob along with all thier sympathizers in the middle east . come on use common sence man
2006-06-28 13:38:25 · answer #7 · answered by jojo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because they are not prepared to control the type of government we want them to have.
2006-06-28 13:28:27 · answer #8 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋