I think some people mis-interpret it, but others just go off on a tangent or just want to vent their own beliefs regardless of how relevant they are.
Sometimes questions are so poorly written that they can't be understood.
2006-06-28 12:56:56
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
What do you mean by that?!?!?!?
LOL. Yeah, sometimes I do think that people don't read the question carefully enough or that questions can be taken way out of proportion. I also think that there are a lot of people on here with a lot of different backgrounds and experiences...so of course, every one is going to have a different spin on each question and answer.
2006-06-28 13:05:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Autumn BrighTree 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Never ever. It just could not happen. Everybody understands others always- even when they speak in unknown languages. We are all psychic here and we know what you mean to say even if is not said or written. Usually the first answer is the best answer and the others are equally correct too. Nothing is misinterprted, its just like that.
2006-06-28 13:00:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by ••Mott•• 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's funny to read a question that already is answered!
You want someone to agree with you??
I do agree and I'm not joking, it's true.
I had mails of someone mad at me for some answers I gave because I couldn't explain myself right.
I think some questions just need a spoken answer.
2006-06-28 12:59:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by Andi Rolf 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
John a million:a million The Jehovah's Witnesses have mistranslated it to be the be conscious became "a" god as a replace of that He became God. each of the old testomony scriptures about tithing. they're misinterpreted because in the present day's evangelists and pastors disobey Jesus even as He warned us contained in the myth of the wineskins now to not placed the hot wine contained in the old wineskins or it may ruin both. they attempt to position this old testomony regulation onto the hot Covenant which Jesus stated will ruin both. And their definition of tithing in the present day isn't even what God set it as a lot as be contained in the old testomony! The unfavourable did not tithe in any respect, the tithe became not in any respect money until eventually it became the ruin of conflict and it became once a three hundred and sixty 5 days to be eaten by the persons. The tithe for the monks became amassed each 3 years and became in straight forward words nutrition. And this scripture used to help that egocentric fake "prosperity" gospel. 3 John:2 "beloved, I favor by and massive issues that thou mayest prosper and be in well-being, even as they soul prospereth." The NIV would not translate it as prosperity. They take this one possibility free reality from a guy that gave up all he had to adhere to Christ, an encouraging message he became giving to a unique believer that became rejecting the flesh and problems with the international and overlook about each of the numerous new testomony scriptures that warn us that Christian's should not be wealthy. contained in the beatitudes Jesus got here proper out and stated, "Woe to you who're wealthy! For you've your advantages in finished." Paul, Peter and Jude preached vehemently hostile to it. And 0.5 of the e book of James is dedicated to preaching hostile to it. yet preachers in the present day say that economic prosperity is the blessing of the tither. for sure they're prospering very much from it besides.
2016-11-29 22:40:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by wessling 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, even 'i' have done this, and normally I'm fairly careful. But there have been a few times that I just knew what it was about, jumped in there and answered it, and then looking at it again, went 'oops'...because I had missed something. I guess it's just human error.
2006-06-28 12:56:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by merlin_steele 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yup, I agree. It's usually nicer to go swimming at night. But a beach on a hot day in the summer is fun too.
2006-06-28 13:18:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
What's the supposed to mean? Are you calling me a racist?
LOL ;-) JK
2006-06-28 12:56:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah.
2006-06-28 12:55:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by neemia4lyfnot 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
what are u talking about u sick pervert... haha i completely agree<3
2006-06-28 12:58:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by amandafay♥ 2
·
0⤊
0⤋