To me Nader is just a liberal under a different name.
Most independants though, would like to slash programs for the poor like Republicans and yet adhere to extremist liberal philosophy like supporting partial birth abortion.
Why can't we have a candidate that looks out for the little guy, but isn't trying to take God out of every thing?
Why do we always have to choose between tax payer funded abortions or tax cuts for the rich.
I think it is because of money and the special interests. However, without special interests the "little man" doesn 't have that voice.
It seems we are always stuck with choosing the lesser of two evils.
Does anyone else feel this way?
2006-06-28
12:38:10
·
7 answers
·
asked by
chuck3011
3
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics