The resolution in question had but one purpose, and that was to put the Democrats in a no-win situation politically. If they voted for the resolution, they would be tying themselves to President Bush’s disastrous policy. If they voted against the resolution, the Democrats would expose themselves to the charge that theirs was a position of “cut and run”—precisely Karl Rove’s strategy for turning the albatross of the Iraq disaster into another Republican election-winner, as it was in 2002 and 2004.
2006-06-28
10:47:32
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
Karl Marx was smart.
2006-06-28
10:51:43 ·
update #1