English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I'm talking about the right-winged Republicans that will support him regardless of all the wrong decisions he's made.

2006-06-28 09:31:54 · 25 answers · asked by Dan 3 in Politics & Government Politics

25 answers

I would think nothing short of a dead hooker in the Oval Office for some of them.

2006-06-28 09:34:37 · answer #1 · answered by Guelph 5 · 0 1

What will it take for the blind liberals who want to hold Bush accountable for all that has gone wrong in this country. There are some left-wing Democrats that wouldn't support him even if he gave them exactly what they said they wanted--which is what he has explicitly done and often enough to make his supporters almost as unhappy with him as his opponents.

Consider this, some of the things that are wrong in this country have practically nothing to do with whoever the resident of the white house happens to be. Some of us are simply stupid, greedy, etc. whether Bush was there or not.

2006-06-28 09:40:04 · answer #2 · answered by Rabbit 7 · 0 0

I hold him responsible now, but I guess that takes me out of the heavy right-wing group that you are talking about. I just want both sides to put blame where it really should be. There are some things that have happened in Bush's two terms taht are not his fault. There are some that are directly his fault, but not everything. Just as long as people take their heads out of the sand and look at the bigger picture that lies outside of the term(s) of one president and see the grand scheme of things in time, then I see no problems with them. If they keep their head in the sand and see only this term or these two terms, they are completely ignorant and have no right to criticize anyone or anything that has happened.

The "blind republicans" will probably never really own up to the problems because that is their current man on the throne. Once he is no longer there, they will likely start to show their issues with him, but they will definately not do it while he is stil in office.

2006-06-28 09:38:32 · answer #3 · answered by The Shadow 4 · 0 0

You mean the exact opposite of all the Left Wing Liberals who think Clinton was so darn special eventhough he allowed 9-11 to happen? Sent jobs overseas? Destroyed family values? Alienated John Q Public? Heavily damaged the economy? Put us even further in debt than we already were and then robbed the white house and air force one blind before he finally left?

Bush isn't a saint, I'll grant you. His amnesty *censored* just makes me want to vomit, but he didn't CAUSE hurricane Katrina, he didn't CAUSE 9-11 and what he SHOULD do is quit trying to run a humanitarian mission overseas and pay more attention to the welfare of this country but history has PROVEN that war is actually GOOD for the economy in the long run. Pull out your books and do some studying, world war I, world war II, viet nam, korea and even desert storm showed strain on the economy DURING the war and a HUGE BOOM in the economy as soon as it ended. War is like a slingshot for financial welfare...Bush is just pulling the sling back too far...if he would just end the war it would actually prove to be a really GOOD thing for the US.

But don't blame him for EVERYTHING that has gone wrong in this country because every president has left after effects of his terms for his successor to deal with including Clinton refusing to pay for Bin Laden's head on a plate TWICE while he was in office and then 9-11 happens right after Bush's inauguration. It's the downside of a 2 term max (but NECESSARY!) ... residual effects are just part of the job and ALOT goes wrong with this country that isn't his fault...like sex crimes and child abuse ... blame those on the adult entertainment industry if you MUST have a guilty party but Bush isn't the one out shaking the hands of cherry-popper film makers. Drugs...blame the SOB's smuggling them into the country in the first place or the 12 year old kids selling it on the street to their little brothers and sisters or the parents for not doing a better job of raising their children but it's not Bush putting rocks in their pockets so cool your jets and think before you speak.

2006-06-28 09:45:25 · answer #4 · answered by lady_muse82 2 · 0 0

at the same time as i think compassionate sympathy for the harmless sufferers on both section, i'm only aghast we're not watching Iran a lot, a lot extra seriously. The UN can play checkers with them on the nuclear difficulty all they favor, yet what stands proud to me is that their Mullahs have a elementary conception that waging warfare on Israel and different international places will herald their own messianic era, or will p.c. the go back of the twelfth Imam... what's Israel, or the different u . s . who would get in the bypass-hairs of such an ideology meant to do? i'm no longer so optimistic that Egypt is "turning a blind eye" a lot as its fingers are tied whatever takes position. If any Arab u . s . were to launch an finished-scale attack on Israel, it would spill over into Jordan and Egypt and absolutely destabilize those international places, on the very *least*. I say bypass for the muse. promote coaching. and that i imagine it really is time the added useful Islamics stood for the noble reason, because they're finally the in uncomplicated phrases ones with any wish of having sway over their extremist opposite numbers.

2016-11-15 09:24:41 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

George Bush has done nothing wrong in this country and has not made any wrong decisions. We are at war with terrorism and we should hold all left-wing Americans and others accountable for aiding and abetting the enemies of this country and hang them!!!!

2006-06-28 09:36:28 · answer #6 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0 0

notice how EVERYTHING is Bush's fault...shell for example talks about minimum wage and "9 raises for themselves". This is the logic of liberalism. Throw anything and everything out there and see if something sticks. George Bush will go down in history as being a far better president than any of you libs know. Someday you may eat your words. I don't agree with everything he's done, but I think he was/is the right man at the right time to deal with what we are dealing with in the world. My eyesight AND my insight are fine thankyou.

2006-06-28 09:57:46 · answer #7 · answered by RunningOnMT 5 · 0 0

I guess it would take someone on his staff to accidentally leave his microphone on after completing a State of the Union Address. The world will probably catch him joking around about finding those Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq. Oh wait a minute... he already joked around about that 2 years ago when he said in public at his ranch... "Those weapons of Mass Destruction have got to be somewhere..." If people don't remember that then... Oh I'm sorry, we're talking about the Blind Conservatives, not the Deaf ones...

2006-06-28 09:49:44 · answer #8 · answered by The_Real_Vision_From_Avengers 2 · 0 0

As soon as liberals can get over the fact that they lost the 2000 and the 2004 elections, and as soon as they quit whining about EVERYTHING. Conservatives supporting Bush like they do, is just like people of Massachusetts voting for Kennedy even though they know he killed Mary Jo in the river.

2006-06-28 10:08:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I'm registered as a republican, and I can't stand Bush. I actually voted for the other guy twice! To blind republicans, you should realize he's doing your GOP and this country no good. In Bush's defense, however, he's simply the idiot behind the wheel. Rumsfield and Cheney tell him where to steer this sinking ship we call the US of A.

2006-06-28 09:38:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

My roomates girlfriend is one of those and half way through the loose change9/11 documentary I turned it off she has completely got her head in the sand, bush can do no wrong. There is no changing their opinions after all they disagree with yours and mine, its only far besides the 1st amendment allows them to be just as blind as anyone else. People will rather stand and defend something they know is wrong then ever admit that you are right.

2006-06-28 09:40:16 · answer #11 · answered by Question Everything 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers