will Iraq become a peaceful democratic nation before the next u.s. Presidential election.
2006-06-28 07:36:57 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Absolutely NOT.
The number one claim of Republicans is that Democrats are weak with national security and war issues. If peace has come to Iraq by 2008 then we will be in some other major situation in order for the Republicans to make the public believe they still need a Republican leader.
2006-06-28 07:42:05 · answer #1 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The US is in the process of establishing a permanent military prescence in the Middle East by building permanent military bases in Iraq. There is no intent on the part of the administration to ever leave Iraq.
On the other hand, there is almost no probability that Iraq will become a "peaceful, democratic nation" anytime in the next decade. The Iraqis will almost certainly not become peaceful until American occupation forces have left, which isn't going to happen. They will also not become peaceful until a new, powerful regime is established that can overcome the ethnic and religious differences that are presently dragging the country further into civil war. The only other option for peace then would be to partition the country into three separate countries: one for the Kurds, one for the Shia, and one for the Sunni.
As for "democratic", the pretense of democracy in Iraq will only last so long as the US can successfully control the outcome of elections and guarantee that the approved puppets have won. Otherwise, none of the factions vying for control of Iraq have any real interest in democracy as a system of government.
2006-06-28 07:59:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The plan is to surround Iran (the head of the snake,) with democracy, which will likely take many, many years to acheive. Slow and steady wins the race, so no, President Bush will not 'find a way out of Iraq before the end of his tenure.' It's actually quite a project to turn that area to democracy--look at a map to see the coutries surrounding Iran. It's also fascinating to see how many uninformed so-called democrats will answer this question. It's too bad they don't realize how stupid they look.
2006-06-28 07:48:54 · answer #3 · answered by nothnbutsperry 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He can't find his way out of a room. No.
He'll leave that problem to the next administration. Or, he'll come up with an eleventh hour plan, in order to appear to be a hero and drive his approval ratings (or lack thereof) higher.
Regarding Iraq, and the remainder of your question, the words "peaceful," "democratic," and "Iraq," shouldn't be used within the same sentence for 20 or more years. Democracy takes time and willingness to accomplish. We can't impose it on another nation, who had another system for so long. If we do, we cannot expect it to be successful.
2006-06-28 07:43:13 · answer #4 · answered by Ancespiration 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
have you ever taken be conscious those days. we were in a international conflict in view that about the Carter administration. enthusiast Islamofacists were waging conflict hostile to the western civilizations and we purely have not regarded it contained in the previous. Now they have spread the conflict-the front all a thanks to the a options east. i imagine that is an finished international conflict. yet is this Bush's fault? i believe that it really is because he has the heart to comprehend this for what this is and do something about it that has helped us no longer be over taken by those Islamofacists. he's the clarification we are nevertheless a free usa and he's the clarification we are beginning to win this international conflict. purely obviously and overtly analyze all, each of the information and also you'll locate he has finished appreciably extra good for us and the international than undesirable. good day Rain, Al gore is an fool, a properly shown, properly documented fool. And his international live performance became a dramatic failure.
2016-11-29 22:08:57 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no. Iraq wont be a peaceful democratic nation because Saddam is still there and he's the leader. his people kill the American solider for like millions and million of loves one there. john Kerry would be the best president instead of bush last year. the Iraq war might of be over by now, but it still continue.
2006-06-28 07:42:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't see that happening. It will remain the way it is until a new President is in office. Bush will not give up on Iraq until he is done with his tenure.
2006-06-28 07:43:06 · answer #7 · answered by lilgut2 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If he wants the Presidency to remain with the Republican party, then the answer is yes. If he doesn't want the only legacy of his presidency to be Iraq, then yes again. If he wants to keep a foothold in the mideast ( to control oil and to be next door to Iran for our next war ) then no, he will make sure we stay there.
2006-06-28 07:43:33 · answer #8 · answered by commonsense 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nah! The true reason for being in Iraq will persist after Bush is gone. It will take the kind of public action that occurred with Vietnam to get the U.S out of there. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7371253996117324045&q=CIA
2006-06-28 07:41:31 · answer #9 · answered by gourou 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, President Bush will find a way out. It is already in the works. This time we will leave with honor, and knowing we did the right thing.
2006-06-28 07:41:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋