English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I have recently completed a CIPD accredited qualification and have now resigned. My employer think I am liable to pay back the money. I haven't signed anything to say I would stay post-qualification.

2006-06-28 06:59:29 · 10 answers · asked by Anne 1 in Business & Finance Careers & Employment

10 answers

I don't know for certain but I'm inclined to say yes. I know my company specifies a time frame you have to stay for after gaining a CIPD.

2006-06-28 07:04:28 · answer #1 · answered by benaberry_77 3 · 0 0

I would think it must be in writing somewhere. Have you overlooked any fine print? Do you feel any moral obligation to repay it, as you have not fulfilled any expectations? Other wise, if not in writing that employer has learned a lesson and should make changes in his/her hiring agreements. There was a time when just a handshake sealed a contract for both parties. Those days are gone. Everything needs to be in writing with every "T" crossed and every " i " dotted. It's what we've come to.

2006-06-28 07:10:23 · answer #2 · answered by ed 7 · 0 0

You may not have signed anything to say you'd stay for a certain period of employment post qualifying, but check your notes from the meeting/appraisal/supervision in which this was discussed and agreed; you may have agreed to 'something' in this meetings documentation, without actually realising it????

2006-06-28 07:20:35 · answer #3 · answered by denisewarren0 1 · 0 0

it is generally recognised in the UK that you will stay a minimum of 1 year after qualifying, but it cant be enforced unless you signed to say you would do so or repay the costs if you did leave.

2006-07-04 21:59:51 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

if you did not sign any papers to that effect then no.
they will probably give you 10 minutes to collect your things and get out, after you make that statement.

but really you are not bound by contract or law to stay the duration, and surly they knew that if they sponsor someone it is possible that they might always be someone who does not wish to complete.

2006-06-28 07:06:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

in the uk,you normally have to work for a certain period,to stop people doing the job only for this purpose,i think you l l find your employer gets re imbursed for losses through the government ..they make out they are paying for alkind........please note this is uk

2006-06-28 07:07:42 · answer #6 · answered by shoopy213@yahoo.co.uk 2 · 0 0

well u got a good case their myt. need a layer phone 911 for free lol joking no idea myt

2006-06-28 07:04:17 · answer #7 · answered by hasan05842 3 · 0 0

If it is not on paper dont see why you have to pay them. Suggest you consult a lawyer.

2006-06-28 07:07:51 · answer #8 · answered by Stormy Weather 1 · 0 0

well if you worked for what you earn why should you pay back .thats your money dude

2006-06-28 07:06:58 · answer #9 · answered by who knows 5 1 · 0 0

what goes around will come around

2006-06-28 07:31:13 · answer #10 · answered by spike 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers