This question is about the war on terorism.?

Question

What is your veiw standpoint as 'American citizen' about the real threat of North Korea? Please read the following before answering.


The president has turned the attention of the world to Iraq, Iran and all of those other middle eastern countries. But I beleive that Americas biggest problem is the the foe we least expect. History repeats itself, like always. I beleive that are biggest threat, we being the world, is the North Korean army. They still have nuclear weapons and they have threatened the United States to use them. If the United States goes to war, the rest of the world goes to war.
Thats how its always been. The North Korean army clearly is more advanced then Iraq. They have migs, they have an updated arsenel. Oh, and did I mention, they have NUCLEAR WARHEADS. Iraq might not have materials to make nucs but Korea does. I feal that the United States has stired up the hornets nest and got lucky but if the president tries another stunt like that agan I'm not so sure that America is going to come out in one peice. In other words, the Korean army will give the president the 'crash course' on why it isn't a good idea to bother North Korea with aqusations. The president can't just invade any country he wants and thinks that he can get away with it. Does he want a repeat of the Vietnam war!

Answer 1

bush is the problem.... I dont know why we are not rioting

Answer 2

We are not able to win this battle on terrorism. It simply is not in Iraq or Afghanistan, it's within the Philipeans, Malaysia, in every single place Africa, no longer simply the Middle East. I wouldn't have a defeatist perspective, I have a realist outlook. What Krytox stated approximately us beating Japan in the course of WWII isn't the equal because the War on Terror. We fought enthusiasts, no longer terrorists. We fought bona fide navy forms. Yes, that they had suicide pilots, as good because the massed "banzai" flooring assaults, that's particularly not anything greater than suicide. But all with truly navy pursuits. Yeah, I understand all approximately the Rape of Nan king, and the homicide of enormous quantities of countless numbers of Chinese. It was once a horrible tragedy, however it was once an profession drive doing because it joyful whilst and in which it desired to. Terrorists aren't occupying whatever, they aren't the conquerors. They are Terrorists. If we nuked Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Syria, the Philipeans, Malaysia, and so forth. Just how livable might the sector be? We do this to get at all of the exclusive nations terrorists, then we nonetheless lose. The high-quality we will be able to do is pull our troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan, convey them dwelling, and feature them begin protective our seashores. Let the CIA, and all the ones forms acquire the know-how for us foreign, and take a look at to avert one other nine/eleven.

Answer 3

"bush is the problem"...you are such a moron.

Korea has a nutcase for a leader, now nuke armed thanks to Clinton. He's protected by China, also recipient of Clinton military help.

Iraq may not have been the best thing, but it was in response to real WMDs and to years of failed diplomacy and to proven ties to terrorism despite democrap lies to the contrary.

Russia, France and Germany was getting cheap oil from Saddam all while they sat on the Useless Nations security council touting empty sanctions. They funded Saddam's terrorism. The UN, with those countries and some of the worst violators of human rights in power, is a bigger threat to the US than we realize.

The larger threat to us than terrorism is likely China. As for Korea, we should step back a bit and wait. We shouldn't attack just because Clinton and his failed past administration want to, they caused the problem.

Answer 4

That is why the U.S. is letting China, Russia, S. Korea, and Japan deal with N. Korea. When they are ready to sit down at a 6 nation conference, then the U.S. will diplomatically work with N. Korea.

Answer 5

Well, you see how we're not usually trying to bother N. Korea.
Yet we had no problem invading a country that couldn't really defend itself.
Sounds very cowardly to me!
Especially now that we know why he invaded Iraq. It definitely wasn't because of WMD's... that's obvious!

Answer 6

The answre is... stop them now or pay a higher price later. It's that simple when dealing with a little crackpot leader like Kim.

Answer 7

i think every citizen of US is thinking of going on war with one or the other country.

Answer 8

apparently he does want repeat every that has already happened