when you ask a nasa official about if man kind can go on the moon again this year, 2006, why do they say no. was it just a hoax in 1965 when they said that we landed on the moon or was it real? wasnt the us competting against the russians in 1965 and thought that the only way they can outrun the russians was to send man to the moon. if they did then why cant they send man to the moon again. the technology is much greater today than 1965, so why cant we go up there again? was nasa lying about neil armstrong going to the moon?
2006-06-28 06:02:36 · 7 answers · asked by Ana 2 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Astronomy & Space
"...was nasa lying about neil armstrong going to the moon?..."
No, definitely not. It's unbelievable how many people prefer to accept the half-baked, erroneous "proofs" that show men never landed on the moon to the undeniable scientific facts that prove we did. Take the time to read the facts on this non-governmental website ==> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html
"...the technology is much greater today than 1965, so why cant we go up there again?..."
Yes, our technology has greatly advanced since 1969, but at this time we simply don't have the necessary hardware to put men back on the moon---no Saturn-like boosters, no life-support systems required for manned lunar voyages, no lunar landing equipment, etc.,. It's true that we could build all the necessary equipment, but a number of factors discourage further manned lunar exploration--the space race is over, the American public has lost interest in the moon, and NASA's budget is far below the levels needed to ramp up again for manned lunar flights.
2006-06-28 06:13:51 · answer #1 · answered by Chug-a-Lug 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Computer technology is better today, but rocket technology isn't, or at least not nearly as much as computers are. While the cost of building a computer that can control a rocket's flight is now thousands of times lower than it was in 1969, the cost of the rocket is pretty much the same, so the cost is just too high and we don't build rockets that can go to the Moon anymore.
2006-06-28 06:14:19 · answer #2 · answered by campbelp2002 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We have landed on the moon many times since 1969. Plus do you know how much it costs to send a rocket up? A whole heck of a lot. They need to spend their time and money making repairs to the space station and other things - not to just prove to some very silly people that it can be done.
2006-06-28 06:15:00 · answer #3 · answered by BeC 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
To begin with, we first landed on the moon in 1969, not 1965. Second, in order...oh forget it, stupid question.
2006-06-28 06:11:19 · answer #4 · answered by Oh Boy! 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One doesn't just build a rocket to go the moon overnight. If we don't have plans to go there this year, it will be ridiculously unsafe to suddenly manufacture & launch such a mission in 6 months' time.
2006-06-28 06:05:40 · answer #5 · answered by bequalming 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He needs the persons at nasa to bypass to muslim international locations and pat them on the best and say in the previous you've been superb at math good muslim Thats precisely the challenge "lead them to sense good about their historic contribution to math and engineering" the subsequent insane component might want to be the introduction of a Islamic heritage month in December
2016-11-15 09:10:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Umm, man HAS gone to the moon again, multiple times.
2006-06-28 06:06:12 · answer #7 · answered by Eloise 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋