How many Americans think we should invade all the Arab /Islamic countries and force the Arab/Islamic citizens living in the USA into military prosons and concentration camps?
This is not my idea at all but I am guessing the plan of Bush & Cheney? I am sure that Israel will back them up as well?!!!
2006-06-28 05:57:59 · 12 answers · asked by conchdiver 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
WARNING! This question may very well open up a can of worms! lol
2006-06-28 05:58:58 · update #1
As an Iranian , I must say that the Iranian people wouldn't mind, they have had a rough time under a radical Islamic regime and want freedom and I think that the invasion of Iraq with all its faults has been very helpful to the Iraqi nation and has also had a good effect on the u.s economy ( the strengthening of the dollar against other currencies), however Iran is 3 times the size of Iraq and has a better defense than most middle eastern countries and a war can become very Bloody and cause great losses of Life. If only all countries possessed democracy and freedom, we would not have seen tragedy's like 9/11 or the Iraq- U.s war!
2006-06-28 06:30:15 · answer #1 · answered by anahita . 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
If you know anything about game theory, then I don't see why we shouldn't. Life is about risks and opportunities. If we want to secure our future while keeping a few radicals from threatening it, then we must do what we have to do. I didn't agree with invading Iraq, because they did not possess the capability of launching attacks against the U.S. or other peaceful nations. However, I do agree with tactically striking Iran, only to keep their nuclear ambitions at bay. Thats all we need is another country, led by an unreasonable man who agrees with the killing of innocent people, to gain a nuclear arsenal, and then have the capability to threaten neighbors or peaceful nations. While most people think the U.S. is just some big bully, if we don't keep the peace, who will? I doubt Europe, S. America, or Africa have the stomach or the common sense to combat idiocy. I agree this president has done almost everything wrong, but we have got to get tough with these nations or else we face another N. Korea. A person with a dictator at the helm who would rather have military marches then feed his own people.
The world is a silly place.
2006-06-28 13:07:52 · answer #2 · answered by Chris 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I admit, it does look horribly like a Tom Clancy novel, doesn't it?
I believe that wars of aggression are wrong. Iran has not attacked anyone. I would hope that the United States' people, their military generals and statesmen, common folks, and all of its allies would stand up and say "Hell NO!"
We cannot allow a military power to continue to march around and destroy more and more of the world. We have the United Nations for a reason, no matter what some officials in the United States think, the US signed onto that charter.
Continued acts of aggression will lead to the next world war and this one threatens to be an atomic one on both sides.
2006-06-28 13:09:05 · answer #3 · answered by NeoArt 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Other than Afghanistan, we shouldn't be in the middle east. Who cares how many people Saddam gassed and/or executed? I don't. It wasn't our problem. Let the UN handle it.
I could care less about Iran too. As long as they don't threaten us I could care less who they attack or nuke.
The funny thing with the middle east is that if you leave them alone they'll kill each other off. You ever notice that? I look at it like this...let Saddam free...put him back in power. Let him fight Iran again. They'll kill each other by the millions. Whats in it for us? We no longer have to worry about terrorists from either country!
We shouldn't think about going into Darfur, Somalia, or any other hot spot...I could care less about them. Besides, we would only be accused of being "imperialists", and if we sent in the military it wouldn't be any different than Iraq!
2006-06-28 13:29:08 · answer #4 · answered by Whitey 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No-- becuase that will only breed an even greater hate for the US + fortify the "american crusaders" opinion.
You don't get it-- the idea is to be friendly with Arab states so that our oil supply is not threatened.
Besides, we could never do it. We can even really handle what we've got now. We are stretched pretty thin.
2006-06-28 13:09:06 · answer #5 · answered by dapixelator 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
All we'd have to do is give Israel the ok
It'd all be done in a month.
Little Israel would kick their A$$ES all by herself.
Then we could deal with the supposed "Islamic Americans" who love this country so much that they want to destroy it.
2006-06-28 13:04:00 · answer #6 · answered by snakeman11426 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i ain't an american but she has no right to gain control over middle east for she will not be able to hold another blow as iran is stronger than afghanistan and iraq, america is sure to be defeated in the war.
do u want another vietnam?
2006-06-28 13:17:37 · answer #7 · answered by Raveesh 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I feel sure that is exactly their plan, righteous judgment,,, morally justifiable,,, world doom and the goal of Revalation or Apocalypse.
Anybody seen Karl Rove, Bush's senior subject lately,, he writes the script for this bunch of Republican characters.
2006-06-28 13:18:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No No No. We already have a big mess. Without causing more problems for us and espically for our poor Troops who are going throgh terrible times as it is now days
2006-06-28 13:14:40 · answer #9 · answered by julie o 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, but we should not be intimidated either Mr. Guevarra
2006-06-28 15:28:02 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋