English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

NO! Not in the U.S.

If there is a company policy stating what forms of ID that you are supposed to check and you did not, then he can fire you!

2006-06-28 04:06:31 · answer #1 · answered by Check Spelling 4 · 3 0

I'm not sure but it doesn't seem right. If you verified the information on the check with the license and signature and the check looked authentic then it should not be your fault. That is why most places charge a high fee for returned or bad checks. That is also why most companies enforce the process of verification so they weed out as much as possible.

2006-06-28 04:10:22 · answer #2 · answered by dgclip1981 2 · 0 0

It would depend on the situation.

If your company requires you to run checks through Veri-check or some other program that verifies funds, and you failed to do so, then you violated company procedure.

If there are notices posted or you have been otherwise notified not to accept checks from certain individuals, and you did so anyway, than once again you were at fault.

There are many situations, and you have not given much information about your particular circumstances.

2006-06-28 04:42:59 · answer #3 · answered by Sharingan 6 · 0 0

I think that depends on the employment policy, employees should be told this before they begin work.

2006-06-28 04:04:43 · answer #4 · answered by Cherri 1 · 0 0

Not unless you didn't follow the correct procedure of asking for ID, etc.

2006-06-28 04:09:10 · answer #5 · answered by notyou311 7 · 0 0

no...you didnt know they were bad

2006-06-28 04:05:02 · answer #6 · answered by JoHanna 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers