Did the Supreme Court open a can of worms?

Question

When the Supreme Court upheld a good portion of the Texas redistricting plan, did they open a can of worms that will encourage all states to redistrict each time a party takes over their house?

I was surprised to find that law doesn't require waiting for the census for redistricting.

What happens next?

Answer 1

politicians are screwing themselves in the long run by doing this...they are creating the devisive mood in the country just in order to get reelected and keep power...

Answer 2

the way the regulation replaced into written contained in the previous the alternative, exertions unions were waiting to donate infinite parts. How replaced into THAT trustworthy? No, the dems are really indignant by skill of reality there is competition for the unions interior the political section now. The unions "close down plant existence" anytime they pass on strike. The unions "impact political campaigns with out any regulation". "people used to stress on the problem of the mafia, those are the present mafia, in basic terms plenty more desirable prepared, and carry plenty more desirable administration." This remark describes unions to a T.

Answer 3

It did. Although I hate Dems -the politicians, not the voters- I believe it was scummy of texas Reps to do it.

Answer 4

As long as Bush is in office , you'll continue to be surprised . You do remember that he was Governor of TX at that time ?

Answer 5

But they threw out the discriminatory parts that violated minority rights (Hispanic gerrymandering).

Answer 6

any time you let them make a ruling that effects the entire country we are in trouble

Answer 7

they were going fishing and needed bait

Answer 8

It might, and if it does, oh well. Sit down, strap up and take it.....

Answer 9

YEP, GOIN' FISHIN'.