English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I've looked at 911truth.org and other alternative news sources. Apparantly Corporate Media wants to keep a lid on the matter.

2006-06-28 02:46:40 · 20 answers · asked by Jim R 1 in Politics & Government Government

20 answers

Honey, I hate to tell you, but this "evidence" that 9/11 was an "inside job" was already disproven. Don't you think that the news media would love to release it if it was so? After all, they already had to admit that there was no actual "wire-tapping" and that the "leak" was actually the disclosure of declassified information. It's like every time an allegation comes up, it's disproved, so they have to come up with something else. They'd love to jump on the conspiracy theory bandwagon. 911truth.org is LIES. So is Loose Change. So is letsroll911.org. The .org at the end of their names means nothing.
My proof? A 100 year old magazine, with no political affiliation. Go to www.popularmechanics.com, and search for the story about debunking the 9/11 myths. They have actual testimony from witnesses, firemen, police officers, and scientists who studied exactly how and why those buildings came down.
Please, please, please research this more thoroughly. I've seen all those sites, I've seen the "evidence", I've watched their "documentaries". I found them to be about as true as Fahrenheit 9/11, which Michael Moore himself admitted was mostly lies. The rest was a distorted brand of truth and misquotes, and things taken out of context.

2006-07-06 05:57:03 · answer #1 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 0 10

I saw a couple videos online, including, "Lose Change", and after watching that, I was completely convinced the towers were loaded with explosives, and were brought down in a controlled demolition.
Then I got on the Popular Science website, where they scientifically disproved every claim the conspiracy enthusiasts have made regarding 9-11, concerning the towers' collapse. Only thing thats ever bothered me about the way they dropped was something I learned in "Loose Change": Prior to Sept 11, no skyscraper ever built collapsed the way the WTC did, whether due to fire OR airplanes flying into them.

What they WEREN'T able to refute was anything Michael Moore said in "Fahrenheit 9/11". We invaded Afganistan to oust the government there and install one which would allow the trans Afgani oil pipe to be constructed. For Bush to go on TV night after night after Sept 11, and say how he was gonna "smoke 'em out of their holes", well, Mr. Bush? Ive seen a lot smoke the last 6 years, and most of it's being blown right up my.... well, you get the idea. We dont "know" where Bin Laden is. $50 million dollar reward on the guys head, and now we dont even know if he was actually responsible? 5 years later?? The greatest intellligence gathering force in the history of the world, and we know nothing?

There is one claim "Loose Change" made, which hasnt even been addressed in the news media. Donald Rumsfeld, Jeb Bush, Dick Cheney and others were members of a neo-conservative group called "Project for the New American Century", which, in its manifesto, projects the only way certain items of its agenda could be promoted and accepted by the nation was if there were some "Pearl Harbor-type" event.
I'm not saying they orchestrated anything, but to calmly discuss, not to mention PUBLISH, the annhilation of innocent citizens to advance an agenda, sounds pretty monstrous to me. Beware of ANYONE asking you to sign something which is for "The Greater Good".

But I have to say, an airplane crashed into the Pentagon, not a missile. What I find hinky about THIS is, the plane just happened to crash into the one section of the Pentagon specifically retrofitted to withstand such an impact? At an estimated 500 mph? Please. Try again. Clearly there are some issues here which do need more study. Only problem is, there's no one for the Bush administration to "Jack-Ruby" to keep quiet.

2006-07-10 15:30:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It's not corporate media my friend...it's the government that is keeping a lid on everything.....they even paid family members of 9-11 victims not to sue or talk to the press about certain things...

You think you heard it all I would also advise you to look at the source listed below...

2006-07-07 18:17:49 · answer #3 · answered by vdubbchick 4 · 0 0

Wow - some people will fall for anything. You know what really sucks is that we all fall for this B.S. at one time or another.

We all get suckered - Americans love a conspiracy even if it has to be made up and fabricated from nothing. Capitalism loves the conspiracy and rewards those who claim one when none exists by selling books, documentaries etc.

Advertisements get us all the time - we all pay more for name brand products and they aren't any better. SUCKERS ALL -YA and ME TOO.

Take Milk - "does a body good" - reality: "does the dairy industry good" - every dairy product that has 2% dairy fat or higher takes calcium out of your bones - U.S. has the highest levels of osteoporosis in the world bar none. dairy fat has to be broken down in the liver and the body does that by using calcium - and if you eat too much butter or ice cream (very high dairy fat concentration) then your body extracts it out of your bones to break it down. Wa-la

Boy are we all stupid - especially when we turn 60 and break both hips when we trip on the carpet at home. Stop drinking milk unless you are a young cow that needs to add 85% bone mass in 5 months time. Milk is for cows, you silly rabbit. Butter and Ice Cream are for Morons. - I know - I think it tastes good too. Jumping off cliffs seems like fun to some people too.

This has to be my weirdest answer yet. Still all true though.

2006-07-11 03:31:25 · answer #4 · answered by jjttkbford 4 · 0 0

I don't think it's Corporate media that wants to keep a lid on the matter... look a lot higher up.

2006-06-28 09:50:06 · answer #5 · answered by RAllen1st 5 · 0 0

Im with you on that! I watched a few shows about it and I don't know what to think. It might be that a war was in the best interest for Bush and it was just conveniant timing...not sure. But the implosion theory and the firefighters recall of what they heard sure makes it a good one.

2006-06-28 09:51:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

While I grave doubts that anyone calling themselves an American would perpetrate such an act, but I CAN imagine that the Bushies knew all about it and allowed it to happen so they could use it as justification for every horror that they have unleashed upon us and the world since.

2006-06-28 09:51:21 · answer #7 · answered by Immortal Blade 3 · 0 0

That's stupid, insulting and entirely without merit.

The reason mainstream media keep a lid on it is because they don't want to lose their credibility by airing such nonsense.

2006-07-06 13:45:05 · answer #8 · answered by Think First 2 · 0 0

There is also compelling evidence that there is a small group of elitist people controlling the world, and Bush is their puppet. He is just one of many.

So what are we going to do about it?

Nothin.

2006-06-28 10:44:15 · answer #9 · answered by ... 4 · 0 0

I hate Bush but it just seems too horrific to think they would bomb our own people. however it does look sooooooo much like a planned demolition when those towers came down. Who knows what our government is truly capable of?

2006-07-10 16:28:32 · answer #10 · answered by miss_nursie_nurse 4 · 0 0

Same thing as Roswell, X-files and Night Stalker.

Fiction.

2006-06-28 09:50:55 · answer #11 · answered by Iridium190 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers