this is a good one.......
2006-06-28 02:44:09 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Umm aren't they the same thing.
2006-06-28 02:47:25 · answer #1 · answered by Lupin IV 6 · 4⤊ 4⤋
I agree with the first person. They are the same thing. I mean, more spending would require more money and liberals think they can spend our money better than we can. All we're good for is working for it. I do believe that is the definition of a thief.
2006-06-28 09:51:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ted Kennedy?
2006-06-28 09:47:51 · answer #3 · answered by clmurphyjr2002 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your question is an oxymoron.
Liberals give to those who need it most, they don't take- by definition.
So, if you crossed them you'd end up with someone who doesn't give or take.
2006-06-28 09:55:44 · answer #4 · answered by ideogenetic 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A Reich-Wing, Cancervative, Neo-Moron. Get a life, stop getting it twisted.
2006-06-28 09:51:55 · answer #5 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nixon-Bush
2006-06-28 09:48:38 · answer #6 · answered by kritikos43 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
An ACLU lawyer
2006-06-28 13:15:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oooh! oooh! Pick me! Pick me! John Kerry?
2006-06-28 09:48:19 · answer #8 · answered by (R) 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
George and Cheynne? (I hope I spelt that corectly)
st
2006-06-28 10:44:48 · answer #9 · answered by Starreply 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hillary clinton
2006-06-28 09:52:38 · answer #10 · answered by oldbuckhorn 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A ninja?
2006-06-28 09:48:10 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋