yep...you got it right. They don't want Bush to look like he was right...
Makes me wonder "whose side are they on"?
2006-06-28 02:03:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by DAVER 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
Later the same day, the US military said Rectum Santorum was talking out of his asss about it, much like you. If you want to look for WMDs, you chickenhawk, go sign up for the military.
For those reading this other than the liar who posted the question:
The alleged "weapons" were from 1991 and so degraded as to be unusable. Most were empty and the casings contained trace amounts, not enough to be lethal to more than people in a room.
This was an accidental finding that even the Iraqis did not know they had. The US military stopped looking for WMDs in 2004, and in their final report (which Shrub refuses to talk about) the Pentagon admitted there NEVER WERE WMDs in Iraq. Period.
2006-06-28 09:17:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
So after 4 years they finnaly found some so called WMDs. The borders in iraq have been so unsecure that insergants traffic weapons in and out everyday. Who is to say that these insergants didn't bring them in themselves, and now the government is trying to say that saddam had them. No i don't believe that there were any WMD's in Iraq, what i do believe is that when the U.S. mobilized into iraq, the borders were left unsecure. Till this day they are very unsecure, and i believe that any weapons or containers or other things that might be considered parts of WMD's were brought in by insergants to use against our soldiers, they were not there when we invaded. As far as the news story the lady heard, think about it, the news are censored to who ever owns the company, they decide what they wanna show and say. If they are Bush supporters of course they are gonna turn the news from the truth to what they want you to believe.
2006-06-28 08:58:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
For the same reason they are not reporting that the unemployment rate in Iraq was 50% when all this started... then went up as high as 60%... now that sadam is out of there and we are helping the new government to get established it is down to 20%.
CAN YOU SAY AGENDA!!!
There are lots of other things the media doesnt report and it is either driven by the Democratic agenda or by the dollar (what sells papers)
2006-06-28 09:10:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by richard b 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
According to the talking heads, the containers they found were there before the Gulf War, so they're no evidence that Saddam was producing WMD after he was ordered not to, and they were so deteriorated that they couldn't have been used as weapons anyway.
2006-06-28 09:23:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by cross-stitch kelly 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ok, first of all, you need to take your mom to the doctor because she is hallucinating. Beyond that, try reading a newspaper because they have not found a single weapon of mass destruction in, near, or around Iraq...
2006-06-28 08:56:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by recallsrus 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I didn't hear about it even on the today show. When did this happen? Your mom saw it on CNN? Wonder why it wasn't anywhere else. Huh, good question.
2006-06-28 08:54:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by pepper 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am not sure, I did not hear that. But it maybe a cover up. I know he is right and I will continue to stand by him.
dp
2006-06-28 08:55:37
·
answer #8
·
answered by mikemadie 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope didn't hear it. If they did find anything Bush probably took it over there when he went on his recent surprise visit.
2006-06-28 08:51:43
·
answer #9
·
answered by Dave 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, that was 50 containers of WD40.
2006-06-28 08:51:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by I'manalienfrog 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
what the hell are WMD ...i hate bush lol
2006-06-28 08:52:03
·
answer #11
·
answered by Dina 2
·
0⤊
0⤋