With FBI stating it has "no hard evidence that Bin Laden is connected to the 9/11, why isn't this BIG News?

Answer 1

Because they don't wan to look stupid for wasting tax payers money.

Answer 2

HA!! The CIA knows more than it will ever tell, and the FBI are just a bumbling bunch of losers who dont know what's going on. The CIA, with the government's blessing, blew up those buildings on 911 because they needed some major catastrophe to rally the country around Bush. And it worked, didnt it? All the rednecks and christian right backed him up and supported the war. We dont trust politicians as a rule, so why would we think that all of a sudden, when it comes to foreign policy, they suddenly grew a brain and we should trust them? Killing people who did nothing to us and losing soldiers is the answer? If they killed those people on 911 to justify a war over oil, then they suck the big one. No wonder the whole world hates the United States. I hope people around the world know that there are some of us who dont support imperialism. As for the question, the media is controlled by the neo-cons, so what do you expect? There also is no evidence of WMD in Iraq, but that didnt stop the war, did it? Maybe if they did an episode of it on "Desperate Housewives", there might be a reaction

Answer 3

I have not heard this from the FBI but I doubt that Bin Laden was not involved in 9/11.

Answer 4

Because it would make your president look like a dummy! They had a video tape that surfaced shortly after 911 and one of the so called terrorists was filmed talking to Osama telling him of the 911 fiasco and it appeared that Osama didn't know a thing about what went on or how. We all know somebody who was told something that they knew nothing of and saw how they reacted to the news. This is exactly how Osama reacted. So to say it was his idea or plan is purely fiction. Bush stated that he was out to get Osama and that he wouldn't relent from that goal. Well now there would be no reason to get him according to the FBI but Bush has not taken back his pledge or he is giving it time so that he can change it somehow thinking that we have all forgotten what exactly it was that he said.

Answer 5

This is not big news because no matter what the current administration says, it will later be deemed wrong. Everyone is trying so hard to influence votes for the next election that nobody seems to want the real truth but just their own version of the truth. We need to work together as a nation. While criticizing our government is almost a national pastime, if everyone would just close their mouths and get to work doing something positive to help, our government would be in much better shape.

Answer 6

Because, he might not be, we always knew that, he just runs the terrorist group, he might not have thought up the plan, hell he might have not even known about it... its like president bush had zero knowledge about what was happening in abu grav prison, but yet he is still blamed.


Why, because they are the leaders.

Bin laden likes blowing us up, no matter if he did or did not actually know about 9/11 origionaly. He organized the lackies, he helped design the organization, and ultimatly, he gloated when our towers came down. Him being actually connected to the attacks is immaterial at this point. Kind of like if you inspired a 5 year old to kill his parents, you would be responsible as well, even though you wernt the one pulling the trigger.

Answer 7

this is likely that 9/11 became an interior interest. the dual Towers and construction 7 all got here down at free fall % in to their personal footprints. in case you have ever considered the managed demolition of a construction, I doubt you'll imagine that 2 planes presented down 3 skyscapers in decrease ny on 9-11, 2001.

Answer 8

Surprise. The government has very little proof of anything they claim. What about W.M.D.'s They had proof until they went in and found they didn.t exist.

They suggested there was proof that Chile's Allende was going to take the country communist, No proof but they had him removed, assassinated and replaced with a dictator.

There was proof(/) about the attacks on the navy in the Gulf of Tonkin (Viet Nam) Turned out made up but bombed N Vietnam and Cambodia as an excuse.

"To protect America's self interest" is a well used phrase and when you hear it get ready for the propaganda and lies come out to justify action.

Answer 9

They have been saying that for 3 1/2 years!!

They never had any evidence!!!!!



"And as a result of the United States military, Taliban no longer is in existence."
—Bush, demonstrating a weak grasp on reality at a campaign stop in Springfield, Ohio on Sept. 27, 2004.

Answer 10

Because contrary to popular believe this is a conservative media. Don't believe it? Flip on the radio and listen to 80% of radio commentators nation wide. There is no WAY with everything that this administration has done, that the entire administration should not be jailed.

They made Richard Nixon looked like a Boy Scout.

Answer 11

Bin Laden himself claimed credit for ordering the attack.

Lack of 'hard evidence', like a written order, is not surprising nor is it evidence that Osama was NOT involved. It's not like we have the NYT leaking Osama's secret operations.