English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

We're supposed to think that Hitler was evil and Bush so righteous.

2006-06-28 00:56:48 · 19 answers · asked by Buffy 5 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

19 answers

Bush Is invading the middle east to establish his interest in the middle east oil trade once his term in office is over.

Hitler was on a mission to create a pure race, and trying to racially cleanse a nation.

Both are wrong, and considering 2 wrongs don't make a right. I don't see any difference, Both got people needlessly killed for their own agendas.

2006-06-28 01:25:34 · answer #1 · answered by lovpayne 3 · 1 0

Well lets see. We "The coalition" did not invade anyone. We are liberating a country that had been terrorized by a brutal dictator for over 30 years. Hitler was going after real estate. If the united states wanted to turn Iraq into our 51st state, we would not have allowed them to VOTE on their own government, we would not have to try and fight these people through the eye of a needle. It would have been so much easier for us. The coalition is there to liberate and keep that chosen government stable enough so they can build their own forces back up. Then and only then will we leave and gladly do it! Please turn off the computer and study your history. You really don't sound very intelligent with questions such as this.

2006-06-28 01:12:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Well, the actions of Hitler cost millions upon millions of innocent people to lose their lives. So far, the actions of Bush have cost at least 50,000 but more than likely under 100,000 lives. Is Bush anywhere near the level of Hitler? No. But he's still a pretty terrible person and history will more than show that in the decades to come.

2006-06-28 01:02:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The other nations that Hitler invaded had not attacked Germany. The seat of the attack on America comes from this part of the earth. Hitler was not protecting Germany, he was trying to make the world ayerian white race. We were attacke, and we must fight back or be taken over by men who also think like hitler. They want to make our world in bondage to islam. We fight for freedom. Do you think Hitler was going to give Poland back, or any of the other countries he invaded without cause? America stands against dictators that hold their people in bondage, and murder their own kind for no other reason but that it gives them pleasure. Why don't you ask the iraquis if they want Saddam Hussein back in power? America has liberated these poor people and we are helping them gain back their own freedom. Wait and you will see. If we stay long enough for them to completely take their country back and to have freedom ofthe people, it will make the who middle east more stable, and less of our people will die.

2006-06-28 01:06:37 · answer #4 · answered by songbird 2 · 0 0

Europe invaded the middle East in the course of the Crusades and through the colonial boom sessions. the middle east allied themselves with Kaiser Wilhelm in WWI. the middle East feels that England "nvaded" them in 1949 with the institution of the Palestinian State because the English made contradictory elements to the Arabs and the Jews. And the middle East feels that American oil pastimes have invaded them some time previous.

2016-11-29 21:28:35 · answer #5 · answered by jaculina 3 · 0 0

Lucky_J, why don't you attempt to answer the question instead of being a smart a**e, and making yourself look stupid.

Bush unfortunately does not compare with Hitler as the circumstances differ so much. I am no lover of the Cretin, but I cannot believe his actions are due to Hatred, but a more basic need for oil and money. Double standards are however prevalent in both their actions.

2006-06-28 01:07:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hitler WAS evil. We aren't "supposed to think" it, we know it for a fact. A well documented fact.
Comparing what Bush is doing to Hitler reveals something about your thinking..it is flawed.
Step away from the crack pipe.

2006-06-28 01:08:47 · answer #7 · answered by carole0103 4 · 0 0

Hitler didn't bypass the UN and violate world law!


"It's important for [the United Nations'] words to mean what they say, and as we head into the 21st century, Mark, when it comes to our security, we really don't need anybody's permission."
—Bush, during a press conference in 2003 (in the 21st century)
Source: Federal Document Clearing House, "President George Bush Discusses Iraq in National Press Conference," March 6, 2003

2006-06-28 01:05:39 · answer #8 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0 0

Bush is in for the oil, oil is power. Hitler wanted to wipe out the Jews, but why did he want to enlarge his empire? May be he was nuts? Do you think he was sane? Who said Bush in righteous, his election campaign?
I like your question, but I don't know about motives of Hitler.

2006-06-28 01:01:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Sorry to say there is no difference, look at the Patriot Act, Homeland Security (notice the uniforms). Bush is no righteous person he was and still is the worse thing that ever happened to the US.

2006-06-28 01:24:13 · answer #10 · answered by maddogbyrd 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers