Ted had bad judgement. He was decisionally challenged. Mabye some good therapy would have helped him.
What do you think?
2006-06-28 00:46:37 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
I'll have to be politically & socially incorrect...but I'd have to agree.
My thinking is that all humans are "bad" meaning we're sinners. Some sins are just so overt and disgusting that they stand out. But all sins are an affront to God and seperate us from God. The most dangerous thing about us judging Ted Bundy is that it makes the rest of us feel comfortable with our own sins. (I don't want to get into mortal vs. venial sins, right now!)
Anyway, God can forgive ALL sins even though people might not. I often wonder if it is possible for Adolf Hitler to be in Heaven and for, say, Mother Teresa to be in Hell. To the human mind, this is a terrible thought. But so many of us cannot understand the power of God and His willingness to forgive.
2006-06-28 00:58:44 · answer #1 · answered by 4999_Basque 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I do agree that existence in reformatory is worse than execution. it really is between the excuses I help it. the point about execution is that some one then has to take the existence of the felon. this is going to make that man or woman a killer too. yet another excuse i'm adverse to execution. it really is an exceedingly complicated concern and each and every has a own view about it. To have those who commit any crimes signifies that the society has failed. Small tribal communities in distant uneducated elements do no longer look to have those complications you'll be conscious. I do agree besides the undeniable fact that that if someone has an insupportable existence, for any reason that they ought to have the right to end it . That being the case, why could some man or woman who has lived a good existence be compelled to die slowly of a few dreadful dropping ailment even as a felon who has been convicted of homicide can opt for termination?
2016-10-13 22:02:40 · answer #2 · answered by ikeda 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Correct, he was not a bad person when he did not KNOW he was making bad choices. If he knew right from wrong then that constitutes a person who was transforming himself into a bad person just by the choices he made. His choices were made from free will and this excludes mental illness.
2006-06-28 00:53:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wrong. He murdered innocent people. A bad decision is to buy the wrong outfit, not to end someone's life. He was a heartless, cold blooded killer who no amount of therapy could have helped. Serial killers have no conscience so how can they be helped. The one thing they don't have that is needed to be helped is empathy.
2006-06-28 00:53:00 · answer #4 · answered by meggiek97 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Actually, he made some very good choices that kept him out of prison for a long time. I'm not sure that any therapy we know can change a sociopath.
2006-06-28 00:54:00 · answer #5 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think your as crazy as he was sociapathic people are not good people that decisionally challenged they are very smart and can decieve people into trusting and beliveing them.
2006-06-28 00:50:56 · answer #6 · answered by Kookie M 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sexual psychopaths like him have no conscience, and there is no known therapy to help them. He was bad not mad.
2006-06-28 00:51:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i think he is a sick freak and belongs right were he is at...
2006-06-28 00:49:46 · answer #8 · answered by panda 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he's right where he should be.
2006-06-28 00:50:47 · answer #9 · answered by koifishlady 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋