No Not at all. I understand what you are saying and it really is simple.
It's all in how you are raised in the society that you live in.
All around the world women can go topless on the beaches just like men do. Our society thinks it's wrong and therefore teaches it to be wrong.
How ever the old Roman society had a much different way of looking at it being that the human body was nothing to be ashamed of.
2006-06-27 23:11:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Nudity is in no way immoral. I think people are so against it because they are insecure with their own bodies. It could also extend to the Puritan beginnings and extreme moral views of the US for the longest time. I've never heard any preacher say being nude was sinful. Improper, maybe, because of the laws restricting it to certain locations. To tell you the truth, the only reason I don't like full blown nudity is because its hard to find a nice place to sit without bringing along a towel. That's why at beaches I opt for the top off rather than full nudity. But, when I do go to lakes or beaches where nudity is allowed, I take my 2 year old son with, because there is nothing wrong with being naked. And the earlier they learn not to be ashamed of their bodies, the better. Not to mention, the earlier they are exposed to regular, non-sexual nudity, the less they will gawk rudely at girls in bikinis or people at the beaches in Europe.
2006-06-27 23:17:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by elliecow 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'm professional decision and that sounds insane to me. Infact i'd say its extremely disgusting. The regulation to make abortion criminal become by no skill meant for that and no matter how criminal it really is, through my criteria, it really is immoral! easily the added i imagine about that, the added it makes me mad! i'm professional decision for the very undeniable actuality that I do not ignore that embryos dont have a conciousness, they're only some cells, i'm professional decision because i understand people make blunders, I''m professional decision because injuries ensue and that i'm professional decision because if someone needs to get an abortion they'd do it even if its criminal or no longer so i'd extremely they were in the perfect care. collectively, I do do not ignore that any embryo has the flair to be someone and that i do sense that abortion should be a very last motel as its a waste of a existence. i could not easily be acquaintances with someone who would do something like that.
2016-11-15 08:50:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nudity is the most natural state that the human body can be in. We certainly weren't born dressed in clothes! I don't know why we in the US are so uptight about nudity and sexuality. Many other countries are not that way at all. Then again, some cultures are much more so.
2006-06-27 23:13:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Nudity is immortal,but now we are living in civilised world where we need to show our civilisation in nice way to get properly dressed up where you don't need to give a dirty look to otheres body,Nudity became a show buines not in normal life, and tell you if you go to nude beach or place like that you will Start hating these bodies which look nice in clothes.So clothes are better then a GUN my Friend.
2006-06-27 23:29:21
·
answer #5
·
answered by lucky s 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't consider (non-sexual) nudity to be sinful, it depends on who you ask. Yes here in the USA a lot of people feel that it is, but go to Europe, most Europeans are a lot more open minded about things like this.
2006-06-27 23:15:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nudity as such isn't sinful, but it is very rude to be nude in public: if you aren't attractive, you sick people out. If you are attractive, you make people jealous and uncomfortable. When you go outside, put some freaking clothes on.
2006-06-27 23:15:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by presidentofallantarctica 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
well it depends on what your implications are... in a society called the US... being nude in public, is not allowed, but then it's your choice that you want to be... law vs freedom....
but if it's you asking for sex with another person, that's a different story... because you're asking another person to do something that they might not want to do, because they're not comfortable of showing them to you, or are still adjusting to you...
it is not a sin to carry a gun... as long as you don't shoot anyone, it's not a sin... but the purpose of a gun is that... hence we have a problem with law vs. freedom again...
2006-06-27 23:15:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by ryanprague1 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
we live in a puritanicly based society. preach all you want about freedom of religion, but this country was raised on christian values. since this religion wants to control our desires it preaches that the human body is sinful. sex is immoral unless it is b/t a husband and wife, and then only in tasteful ways. interestingly though, this mindset has contributed to the problem of wanton sex by making it taboo. we all know that we want what we aren't supposed to have. way to go christianity! you are the best advertisement the porn industry could have asked for!
2006-06-28 00:44:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by Vee 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
no,there's nothing better walking around the flat and sleeping in the nude.people don't like it as to them nudity=sex, which is something people don't like in a christen dominated world.
2006-06-28 00:28:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by Odin 1
·
0⤊
0⤋