English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

What he did in iraq brought his popularity down by up to 70% in come polls. Do you think his decisions are right or wrong.

2006-06-27 17:21:19 · 31 answers · asked by daman 1 in News & Events Current Events

31 answers

he cant stay, hes already on his second term (thank god for that).
hes lucky hes still alive and someone hasn't murdered him. and to ex-navy retard who answered below, the attack on 9-11 was carried out by afghans(osama) not Saddam or Iraq. you should watch Baghdad E.R on HBO then you will see the carnage bush has caused and the many deaths of innocent american soldiers who have been sent to Iraq because of your beloved Mr.Bush!!! And yes over 3 thousand ppl did die on 9-11 but what about the 2700+ soldiers who have been killed in combat. and then you can add to that the soldiers that have not been accounted for and that the media does not report. yea,lol bush is great right???? Think again.

2006-06-27 17:24:53 · answer #1 · answered by punny812 3 · 1 0

I believe that George Bush's decision was right at first, but the United States should have been out of Iraq long before now. I this he should go!!!

2006-06-27 17:44:41 · answer #2 · answered by PrettyLady53098 1 · 0 0

Well , to Answer your Question : "George Bush. Should he stay as the president or go?"

I'm not sure if you know this , but George Bush is currently doing his 2nd Term, which is the max. a US president can do, a precedent established by George Washington. After this , hes "got to go". So should he stay for a 3rd Term:- Thats not possible :)

Your other part of question...."what he did in Iraq....." - is a completely diff. issue. Thnx.

2006-06-27 17:33:53 · answer #3 · answered by Prash 1 · 0 0

I know Bush has to go regardless of our opinion... because it says so in the Constitution ( he cannot serve more than two terms). But for the record, Bush needs to go! And to comment on what "Ex Navy" said, I think you are wrong on this one buddy. You see, 9/11 had nothing to do with Saddam, in fact, haven't you heard that Osama Bin Laden is responsible for that tragedy. Oh and yea, we still can't find him. Wasn't that the whole point in starting the war in Afghanistan. You see, Bush is trying to divert our attention from the fact that Osama has evaded the U.S. forces, while having kidney problems, mind you. I'm not saying that helping liberate the Iraqis is such a bad thing, but the point is... I feel that Bush went in there for the wrong reasons, without really thinking it through (mind you, he went in looking for WMDs that are yet to be found). In fact, because of the war, Iraq is now completely unstable... so i guess he kinda gave terrorists another breeding ground. So did Bush really succeed in anything. Well yes, he's the reason that so many of our troops are dead, injured, and are facing perils daily.

2006-06-27 19:52:11 · answer #4 · answered by J.A. 1 · 0 0

No, President Bush won't be able to wait to fly the coop. the position did you listen that New President Obama, will be disqualified? that's no longer real and also you want to have patience and by no skill bounce the gun. Bush does no longer get to proceed to exist, besides the undeniable fact that the Presidency would then bypass to Joe Biden. do not spread faux issues or it skill don't be a Propagandic Tokyo Rose.

2016-11-15 08:37:56 · answer #5 · answered by cathell 4 · 0 0

To all you airheads out there that think President Bush should resign. We had over 3000 innocent people killed on 9-11. Thank God that we had someone in the White House with the backbone to stand up to these terrorists and avenge these folks. To all you folks who don't recall history, More Americans were killed on 9-11 than were killed at Pearl Harbor, that was only the beginning of WWII.

2006-06-27 18:09:16 · answer #6 · answered by Ex Navy 1 · 0 0

Well, he can't since his two terms are up. But I never thought he should be President. People criticize Clinton for sleeping with another woman, yet we weren't billions of dollars in debt with him as president. I believe Bush's actions weren't the best ones that could have been picked. I don't approve of the "war on Iraq" and the death of so many innocent people.

2006-06-27 17:27:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Bush has the lowest approval rating since the beginning of his presidency. He has mishandled everything he has touched. He should go, but he won't. He is the President of the United States and it would literally take an act of Congress for that to happen. Problem is, he hasn't done anything to be impeached. Where are you when you need you Monica L?

2006-06-28 04:50:32 · answer #8 · answered by The Nana of Nana's 7 · 0 0

I must say I can't wait to see what the next President is going to do with us...I've had enough of Bush though...not to be mean or anything, but terrible things have happened since he's been in office..like bad karma or something! Enough damage has been done and I don't think he'll get voted back in. With such a serious decision as to go to war, I think there were too many unanswered and puzzling things going on for it to have been or should I say be reason for war. I think our troops should come home to their families and I think he should send his precious daughters over there to fight since we're under attack from possible "weapons of mass destruction" or WHATEVER..blah, blah, blah....

2006-06-27 17:38:02 · answer #9 · answered by Hayuiqan 1 · 0 0

Since this is G Dubya's second term in office, he has to go regardless if he wants to or not.

I personally do not agree with many of the Bush Administration's policies or decisions. I have believed all along that Bush and company are greedy, selfish, arrogant blowhards who only care about pleasing the oil companies that pull their strings.

When it comes to policies of health care, social security, homeland security, education, the enviornment, diplomacy, personal freedom, minority issues, immigration, financial freedom, and personal privacy I think G Dubya's administration will be remembered historically as one of the worst the US has ever seen.

2006-06-27 19:30:37 · answer #10 · answered by Bradly T Weatherford Jones 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers