Of course he did. There was plenty of evidence. The interpretation of "reasonable doubt" was pretty bad. The defense made the furors feel that if they did not see him commit the crime themselves than there was no way to know with 100% certainty that he was guilty. What a shame.
2006-06-27 17:52:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Lisa P 1
·
9⤊
5⤋
That OJ was guilty is a given. However this was probably one of the most important murder cases in United States history. It changed the way that evidence is collected and handled and presented. It also changed the way that the charge of murder is defended.
2006-06-28 15:46:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by Oblivia 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Although i've never been a big fan of the juice, and I hoped he was guilty at first, I got suspicious somewhere along the way. The first thing that got me to thinking something was wrong was why did the cops go to his residence at all? They had been divorced for years. I know the kids, but he could have been notified via phone. Second, when they got to his residence, why did they jump the fence? I know the reason they gave, but it seemed extremely weak too me. 3rd, the mountain of evidence amounted to less than one drop of blood (found on the Juices residence). The glove didnt fit.
But regardless of all that, the jury found him not guilty. I have always been told that a person is innocent until proven guilty, and he never was. So who am I to say he did it? I wasn't there, so I can only speculate. None of us was there, so none of us really know for sure. Many people peg him as guilty, even though they really dont know. I call them hypocrits, because of the simple fact that he is supposed to be innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. So either we have faith in our crimminal justice system, or we don't. I get the impression a lot of people want to pick and choose when it comes to it, and if thats the case, I'll go with the jury, rather than the spectators.
He's innocent in my eye, even though I personally don't like the man.
2006-06-28 01:01:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by jack f 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
It is sad that someone was killed, even worse when the childen of the victim have to face the fact that there father is the nimber on suspect, I don't think that OJ has enough smarts to commit this crime and not leave one piece of evidence, but then again money can buy anything, I really can't say if he did it or not, but I am a true believer in karma, and who ever did this will pay for it.
2006-06-28 00:46:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by SILLYGURL 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
What a huge price for the inadequate use of the justice system. However, I am not surprised at the global attention that this tragedy raped. The Media certainly doesn't want to miss out on the opportunity of a "story of interest". We all pay a huge price for our freedom. Injustice just seems in humane.
2006-06-28 06:21:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ksjeanie63 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
It angers me to think that a man that is as guilty as oj simpson could get of becauses of who he is. you do the crime you pay the time...
2006-06-28 00:25:22
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Thats so old the 1st thing that pops into peoples minds when they hear the OJ tiral they think of orange juice.
He did it.
2006-06-28 00:23:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Priestess Kanonoahka 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Money can pay for a great defence. he had the best attourneys money can pay for and they trashed the district attourneys which are public servents. Had he been a regular ol' Joe, he would have been put away. Then again, had he been a nobody, no one would have cared.
2006-06-28 00:25:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He is as guilty as the day is long, I'm sure that the entire LAPD disliked him so much they tried to frame him for murder....what a joke!
2006-06-28 00:26:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by Eric from Michigan 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
He most definetely did it. He's a heartless piece of ****. He was ordered to pay money for damages to his ex's family and because he's now on "disabilty benefits" he never has to pay a cent. Even though he's loaded. He deserves to die for what he did.
2006-06-28 00:25:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by smurfette_au2000 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
guilty, but got off because of the prosecution bad choices during jury selection. strictly a racial verdict.
2006-06-28 14:07:13
·
answer #11
·
answered by joeybean 2
·
0⤊
0⤋