2006-06-27 16:48:42 · 16 answers · asked by Jayme 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
herd it on the radio today in phoenix.
2006-06-27 16:54:12 · update #1
She's not Playboy Material. At best Swank......
2006-06-28 04:08:59 · answer #1 · answered by lana_sands 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
She is preserving her moral values intact! Shes only a baby, get over it!no longer anybody has to pose for Playboy!!Her father is astounding and by no skill undesirable looking both, I said him on Dr, Phil he"s an outstanding Dad!
2016-11-15 08:37:07 · answer #2 · answered by cathell 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No she can negotiate a better deal. 4 million is so little. She makes more than that now and her career will go down if she poses.
2006-06-27 16:52:17 · answer #3 · answered by The One Truth 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Honestly Playboy needs better things to do with its money...I see better looking girls than her who would probably pose for $4000 here in my home town. They give me $400 a piece, they can take pics of my lovely breasts, lol. (Just kidding!!!)
2006-06-27 16:53:44 · answer #4 · answered by cooperslassie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No,
She`s a good singer.
She should not play songs with her body.
2006-06-27 22:56:11 · answer #5 · answered by Nick Carter 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sure, why not. If they offered me 4 mill, I would do it for sure....in good taste.
2006-06-27 17:40:58 · answer #6 · answered by joyfulnoise83 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, if she'll agree to stop singing.
2006-06-27 16:55:26 · answer #7 · answered by Justsyd 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I don't think she will degrade herself to that extent.
2006-06-27 17:17:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That has to be a rumor! Lmao!
2006-06-27 16:51:46 · answer #9 · answered by outlawsister1973 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no - she doesnt need the cash - i think it is rude anyway
2006-06-27 18:06:37 · answer #10 · answered by aeriolf 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋