I personally think impeachment is too soft and censure is merely political masturbation. My ancestors were instrumental in our great nations first revolution.... perhaps it's time we citizens acted again.
2006-06-27 14:58:24 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes! How can anybody stand behind this liar? It is WRONG to invade countries based on this idiot's whim and to make up lies to sell the war to the American people. He and the people who use him as their puppet have to be held accountable for this mess.
2006-06-27 16:47:56 · answer #1 · answered by sassyfrassylassy 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
In your dreams The Pres. has done nothing wrong, in his head, I mean come on he done such a great job with Iraq.
Come on now how many other Presidents do you know declare war on a country the size of Texas and say its over in two weeks. I mean he's made us a stronger Nation he's like Santa Clause checking are e-mail and telephone call to see if were being naughty or nice. This president has balls what other president in history does exactly the opposite that which the American people want.
I'm mean so what he told a little lie, so did Bill Clinton. Of course Bill was almost impeached for getting some play, but what Bill did was immoral. George just sent us to war.
All I know is if your not for the Pres you must want al Quieda to win, your not for the troops, your probrably a liberal, you probrably beleive that we shouldn't torture prisoners. You probly believe that we shouldn't read people e-mails and listen to there telephone conversations either. I'm mean come on now were at a time of war the rules that applied to other presidents doesn't apply now. Last but not least your probly going to tell me that the news media should be able critices the government and be able to give out top secret information on how there illegally looking at our bank statements. You need to go read a book like GEORGE ORWELLS 1984. I CAN'T BELIEVE YOU LIBERALS
OH YEAH HOW CAN I FORGET WHAT A GOOD CHRISTIAN HE IS. SO WHAT IF HE'S PROLIFE, PRO DEATH PENALTY AND AGAINST GAY MARRIAGE.
2006-06-27 17:58:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He should be impeached and thrown out of office!
The world court is going to be charging him with war crimes!
Look at this gem!
Maybe the end for Bush is near!?
Bush ignores laws he inks, vexing Congress By LAURIE KELLMAN, Associated Press Writer
29 minutes ago
WASHINGTON - A bill becomes the rule of the land when Congress passes it and the president signs it into law, right?
Not necessarily, according to the White House. A law is not binding when a president issues a separate statement saying he reserves the right to revise, interpret or disregard it on national security and constitutional grounds.
That's the argument a Bush administration official is expected to make Tuesday before the Senate Judiciary Committee, chaired by Arlen Specter, R-Pa., who has demanded a hearing on a practice he considers an example of the administration's abuse of power.
"It's a challenge to the plain language of the Constitution," Specter said in an interview with The Associated Press. "I'm interested to hear from the administration just what research they've done to lead them to the conclusion that they can cherry-pick."
The law that they are referring to that Bush said he doesn't care what it says, he'll do what he wants, is the PATRIOT ACT!!!!
2006-06-27 15:04:07 · answer #3 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush should not be tried for Impeachment because he has not absolutely nothing wrong. Bush has NEVER LIED and instead the Liberal Media just keeps lying and making Bush look like an ineffective and crooked leader. Bush knows what is best for America and he has done nothing wrong other than serve the citizens of the United States of America to the best of his ability.
2006-06-27 15:09:09 · answer #4 · answered by Mr. Knowledgeable VI 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do the left-wing wack jobs really believe the dribble they are posting in here? This is ridiculous! GW is probably by most sincere, God fearing, and moral President we have had in the last 40 years. Maybe as far as the lefties are concerned that's the problem.
I really don't understand where this hatred for GW comes from. He is not sending you to war, He sent me and I still support him.
As a member of the Armed Forces it's my duty to support and defend the Constitution of the United States - possibly even die in the process. That includes the First Amendment. So if I were to die defending your right to free speech, please make it intelligent speech and not the crap you guys are posting in here.
In reference to your question, Impeached? Huh no. He has not lied under oath to a Grand Jury like Clinton did.
2006-06-27 15:26:43 · answer #5 · answered by navychief1968 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO!! The 10 dimocRATic-Socialist senators should be censored and imprisoned for making seditious and treasonous remarks about the War on terrorists and the USA, including cutting the morale of US Military Forces and also the leaking of information by the NYT and the rest of the left-wing news media.
2006-06-27 15:05:01 · answer #6 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He purposely blatantly deceived the congress of the united states In his constitutional duty to tell them the state of the union. Weapons of mass destruction.The man took an oath to defend the Constitution he has made it his art to twist turn and break it every chance he has. he is a criminal and should be impeached and tried.
2006-06-27 15:24:03 · answer #7 · answered by Rich 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He has committed no crime - no grounds for impeachment or censure. Being pissed because your candidate didn't win is no reason for a revolution - hang in there, tiger! We can replace him with another Republican in just two short years!
2006-06-27 15:05:07 · answer #8 · answered by Mr. Boof 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I personally think that all three forms of action should be taken against him. However, unfortunately, what is legal is not necessarily moral. That reality torments lots of people on a frequent basis through much of their lives. The law itself seems to be just and trying to do its best. The legal system may be more suspect.
2006-06-27 15:08:11 · answer #9 · answered by spanner 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
FOR WHAT! You are a bush hater and can't see further than your nose. I disliked Clinton for his morals and his ego. He could have been smart but thought too much of himself. He was in there for the glory. bush is there to help this nation and history will show this to be true.
2006-06-27 15:39:14 · answer #10 · answered by killowen05 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yep, many people are thinking like you, but our last Civil War cost us 620,000 lives. I don't think we want that again. At least not yet. I think we can survive Bush without the bloodshed.
It is interesting to see just how divided the responses have been to your question.
2006-06-27 15:04:19 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋