Wikipedia has become over run by pov warring admins and pov warriors. How to fix it?

Question

These people are incredibly abusive. They attack anybody for confronting them, they selectively enforce the rules against those
that disagree with them, admins are allowed to call people names
and stay admins even tho personal attacks are grounds for banning other people, the pov policy has backfired and now the people running the place are actually pov warriors who took the time to become admins. Any examination of almost any government page on wikipedia is full of personal attacks that go unanswered, obvious cases of serious admin abuse, obvious cases of gaming the system, obvious cases of pov warrior admins
driving for their own versions of reality.

Wikipedia is such a potentially awesome resource, how can it be fixed?

pov= point of view...as in republican or democrat or etc. Anything that deviates
significantly from absolute fact.

Answer 1

Bias? I was told in college courses NOT to use Wikipedia as a source because the info is not always creditable or accurate. Never been there, now I see it's at the bottom of this page! Could it be a part of Yahoo? I'll be back!!!!
Yes, I checked out half a dozen terms of fact, and somebody is definatly out of their mind.
Some pretty twisted "facts" of history there!

I think we should complain to yahoo directly!!
Maybe the higher ups have better educations!!!!
These jokers are contradicting themselves, and writing their own versions of history! BIAS!!!