ALL CAREER POLITICIANS NEED TO BE VOTED OUT. THEY ARE CONSPIRATORS AND EMBEZZLERS!
2006-06-27 12:17:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by SLOWTHINKER 3
·
2⤊
5⤋
They should bring six articles of impeachment against him
1. For lying to the American people to justify a false war
2. For ignoring grave warnings that could have prevented the terrorist attacks of 9/11
3.For authorizing the NSA wiretaps of American citizens contrary to the 4th amendment and the Foreign Intelligence Survailence Act of 1978.
4.For the authorization of the release of the name of CIA agent Valarie Plame to politcally punish her husband and then covering it up.
5.For violating numerous international laws like the Geneva Convention which were ratified and became part of US law.
6.For abuse of executive power and criminal negligence in environmental protection law, election law and various other laws.
There are also significant grounds for the impeachment of Vice President Cheney
2006-06-27 21:34:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I assume you have developed this feeling towards our President based on the media's reporting and how the educators explain things (they tend to be like the media and only tell what they want to tell and believe what is printed). You must learn fo ryourself, before you make decisions, that leads to making bad decisions. The weapons of mass destruction is a classic example. For 3 years you hear how the President was wrong, but when the proof was found, and Russia admitted freely to having moved the WMD from Iraq to Syria and Iran, the media buried the story.
Iraq's arsenal of weapons of mass destruction was not captured by US forces who heroically brought down Saddam Hussein's regime three years ago this week. It vanished before they arrived.
Israeli intelligence reported before the US-led invasion that starting in late summer 2002 Saddam's WMD arsenal was shipped by truck convoy to Syria. Recently, documents seized from Iraq after the fall of the regime were released to the public. Those documents revealed that under the direct command of former Russian prime minister and KGB boss Yevgeny Primakov, Russian Spetnaz forces oversaw the transfer of Iraq's WMD to Syria ahead of the US-led invasion. These reports have been corroborated by Saddam's Air Vice Marshall General Georges Sada.
So rather than being destroyed or secured, Saddam's WMD arsenal was simply moved from one rogue regime with intimate ties to terror organizations to another rogue regime with intimate ties to terror organizations.
Of course, American Media will NOT report this, it will prove Bush right, and then they would look stupid.
Michael Moore, thanks:
Friday, 23 June 2006
When News Lies
WHEN NEWS LIES
Media Complicity and The Iraq War
By Danny Schechter, The News Dissector
A new book from Danny Schechter offers an up to date indictment of the role media played in promoting and misreporting the war on Iraq. It is an analysis of how and why the media got it wrong that pinpoints the failures of journalism and the collusion of media companies with the Bush Administration. The author of EMBEDDED: Weapons of Mass Deception (Prometheus 2003), an account of the TV coverage of the US invasion, returns with a more comprehensive, updated and insider look at the media complicity that Schechter argues "made the war possible."
"Most of the anti-war movement focused on the crimes of the Bush Administration ignoring the mainstream media, its far more effective accomplice," says former network producer Danny Schechter (ABC, CNN). "The government orchestrated the war while the media marketed it. You couldn't have one without the other."
WHEN NEWS LIES includes the feature -length DVD of the prize-winning film WMD (Weapons of Mass Deception). The book will also include the complete script as well as a discussion of the challenges of exposing media with media with a documentary. It chronicles the media war fought alongside the military campaign and the struggle to stand up for truth.
Source(s):
Google it:
Saddam, WMD, Spetsnaz
http://www.wmdthefilm.com/mambo/index.ph...
2006-06-27 21:14:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mark W 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think he has made a few wrong decisions, but i don't think he should be empeached. if he is then Dick Cheney will be president for another 4 years following with some of Bush's views. I say let him finish out his last year.
2006-06-27 19:17:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by Biscuit 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
We should have done that on day one. There isn't enough time left and it would cost millions and do nothing. Remember bill Clintonc' Impeachment?
2006-06-27 19:15:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not me. I'd much rather have bush as president than dick cheney.
2006-06-27 19:14:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
id rather have gary coleman than bush and id put emmanuel lewis vice president
2006-06-28 21:22:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Brizzle Hizzle 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I do, I do, I do!! Because I want Cheney to become our President. Thank You if you are working on this.
2006-06-27 19:15:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've got it narrowed down to pretty much just the morons who have never read the constitution.
2006-06-27 19:14:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by freetyme813 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I do, but it will never happen. We might as well let him serveout the rest of his term. Cheney might not be any better.
2006-06-27 19:17:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by Simmy 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
He should be for the wire taps, and for selling a false war
2006-06-27 19:14:53
·
answer #11
·
answered by pj2024 3
·
0⤊
0⤋