What is the relationship between gravity and electricity?

Question

I think Einstein said something about it, but what is the relationship between gravity and electricity?
And when did who figured it out?

I know that one thery is that one abstractoins is that: a moving charged particle creates an electric current which in turn induces a
magnetic field and in the same way a moving masse body creates a masse current which in
turn induces a gravitomagnetic field..... and I know you can derive the magnetic field directly from the electric field!

I know that one abstractoins is that: a moving charged particle creates an electric current which in turn induces a magnetic field and in the same way a moving masse body creates a masse current which in turn induces a gravitomagnetic field..... and I know you can derive the magnetic field directly from the electric field!

Answer 1

First, we have to look at the electron. It is the electron and its multiples that form magnetic fields. Second, we need to take a look at the force of gravity and compare the two.

The electron. This is a small bit of matter formed of electromagnetic energy. This is obvious in that a very high frequency of this energy entering near the nucleus of an atom is able to form electron pairs - negative and positive electrons. In forming an electron a monopole is made. This means an electron has one-half the frequency of the original electromagnetic energy bound in the southern half of the electron as "mass" (offers resistence to movement) and the northern half form magnetic lines extending outward. The center of the electron has an electric field through the plane of its equator. These three parts of the electron are formed of electromagnetic energy.

Multiples of the electron form neutrons and protons, which become the mass of our universe. Because mass is composed of electromagnetic energy, it has an unchangable value of "c" inherent in its composition. That value would be realized were an electron to be taken apart. What would instantly happen is an electromagnetic wave would be released. The value of "c" was there all along.

Secondly, we need to consider the origin of gravitational waves. These waves are formed of a relationship between mass and energy. The equation for a gravitational field is c2 = E/m. It is also that of a field of physical time. Notice if there were no energy to be divisible by mass, then there could be no gravitational field. As the value of "E" changes so, also, does that of the field, c2.

The existence of gravitational waves is obvious. In that the force of gravity performs work, it must have an energy source. it is impossible to perfrom work apart from having some kind of energy. What we need to know is how do the waves (a) form, and what are they (b) formed of.

(a) How the waves form. The basis of gravitational waves is that of the electromagnetic energy that formed the electron. Remember that the value of "c" was the basis of that mass. What the electron did in forming the mass was to complete a circle of more than 360 degrees and overlap part of its frequency, thus remaining bonded to its own frequency, while forming into three dimensions.

As an individual electron, or large mass, moves there is a change in its overall frequency. The lines of frequency become more dense in direction of movement and less dense at right angles to that direction. This is why a mass is able to move, and why it remains moving in its original direction, at its original speed until some of that increased frequency is given to another mass. If there is no manner for that frequency to be shared, then mass must continue to move.

But what happens when a mass is unable to move. It is still three dimensional, occupying the same space, but there is no evidence of the frequency change within the mass. This brings us to:

(b) Why gravitational waves exist and how to relate their existence to mass. It is stated that were a mass to approach to near the speed of light that it would become much shorter in the direction of movement. That is true. Because mass has as its basis electromagnetic energy, it must act in the same manner as what comprises it. The thought in short form is as follows:

E = hf, electromagnetic energy is equal to its frequency times Plank's constant.

mk = hf, mass kinetic energy operates exactly the same way as does electromagnetic energy. When there is an increase of energy in one direction, the overall line density in that direction increases. The energy values at right angles to direction of travel decreases in proportion to that of the forward one. Mass does not gain mass as it moves, it transfers energy (E) from dimensions to dimension.

c = hf, is the last part. The value of "c" is that of a particular form of wave energy - perhaps that of "h".

Now we are able to compare two different masses, in two different locations, doing the same thing but in different manners.

First is that of a mass in a speeding spaceship. The mass is going at a speed of light minus 25 mps. At this speed the mass would be, to an observer standing at a right angle to it, as though it were a very thin line in space. The forward dimension would have become compressed according to mk = hf. The obvious nature of this object is that of its movement. The energy value resident within would be obvious.

Second, lets take a look at a mass within our planet that is 0.717 miles from the core point. The nature of that mass is, that were you to allow it to freely move, it would instantly be moving toward the center of our planet at the same speed as the first mass illustration, moving at the speed of light minus 25 mps. BUT this mass is not going any place point to point. It is forced to remain 0.717 miles from the core point of our planet through all time.

What is the comparison between the two so that we may determine how gravitational waves form?

Were you to take the mass of outer space, and were it exactly the same size as the one within the core area of our planet, and were you to exchange them, it could be done with no problem. The one presently in the core of our earth would immediately be accelerating at the speed of light minus 25 mps in outer space. Then the one that had been in outer space could be fitted into the core of our earth and there would be no disruption. How is that possible?

The moving mass in outer space has obvious energy associated to it. The one now in the center of our planet has the value of mk = hf within just as it had, but now instead of there existing mass moving according to the value of time, the mass is moving time according to mass and energy contained within. The frequency (E) (gravitational waves) of the mass escapes at the speed of light according to the frequency of hf. If the energy (frequency) of the mass within earth were to decrease, so would its relative speed (a person could no longer exchange it with the one remaining in outer space). The hf value demonstrates the energy contained within the earth mass, and as long as the energy value continues to exist (heat) so, also, do the propigation of gravitational waves.

Answer 2

Gravity Electricity

Answer 3

We have not figured it out, and ironiclly, that is one of the greatest topics of our day. The unified grand theoryblahblahblah is this idea that you can link all the forces together in one grand equation, as simple as Einstein's e=mc^2, but the problem is that gravity does not fit with the other 3 forces. There is an equation linking 3 of the forces, but they cannot figure out how gravity fits into the equation, so when they find the answer, i am almost positive that you'll hear about, but that is still a very good question.

Answer 4

Classical electromagnetism and classical general relativity are very similar theories. They have similar structures, formalisms, etc, and similar effects. There are a lot of parallels, but as yet they're not unified. Einstein spent his life after GR trying to unify GR and e/m and failed. One potential unification framework is kaluza-klein style added dimensionality, but this ignore the advance of electromagnetism into current quantum theory.

At the moment unification theory status is:
* electromagnetism and the weak nuclear force are unified into a single electroweak theory. Salam, Weinberg and Glashow won the nobel prize for this.
* electroweak and the strong nuclear force are in the process of being unified into a single grand unified theory (GUT). There are a number of candidate GUTs but so far no single one has stood out from the rest.
* The right GUT and quantum gravity should be unified into a single theory of everything (TOE). So far there isn't even a quantum gravity theory.

Current candidates for unifying gravity and the other forces include supergravity, supersymmetry theories plus super gravity, and brane theories. So far none of these candidates has made testable predictions.


Hope this helps!
The Chicken

Answer 5

I dont' really know if there is a relationship between electricity and gravity. Could you mean the relationship between electrictity an magnetism? They are closley related, and it is just about impossible to have one without having the other.

Answer 6

Read about biefeld brown effect. I think that would help.

Answer 7

your question is both legitimate and interesting.

it is also THE PROBLEM of current physics today.

Einstein looked for the relationship but could NOT find it.

there are TWO main theories today that attempt to explain your question.

they are :

1. Loop Quantum Gravity and

2. String Theory

Your question is a subset of these theories.

I suggest reading Lee Smolin's "Three Roads to Quantum Gravity" or Brian Greene's "Elegant Universe" but they quite heavy reads !

The problem as it stands today appears to be unsolvable for at least one or two decades.

Hope I answered your questions :)

Answer 8

There is none. Unless you use some sort of reverse gravity to "pump up" fossil fuels to make electricity.

Answer 9

It's a platonic relationship according to gravity.

Sorry, I have nothing intelligent - er to say. More intelligent, I mean. See? I can't even talk right.

Answer 10

It uses electricity

Answer 11

I think there is no relation between electricity & gravity