It is all but impossible to prove the source of all. Yet, for the sake of debate, which of the following choices proves most logical:
1) All in nature existed eternally
2) Something in the natural existance is the source of all that ever existed in the natural, (including by evolution)
3) Something beyond nature, and with NO intelligence, is the source of all in nature
4) Something beyond nature, and with intelligence, is the source of all in nature
5) Some other conclusion, (although no other conclusion can be formed without some sort of redundancy).
Please, explain your logic and reason for your conclusion. Logic and reasoning is key.
2006-06-27
10:41:48
·
3 answers
·
asked by
man_id_unknown
4
in
Social Science
➔ Other - Social Science
Thank you for any and all answers.
2006-06-27
10:46:20 ·
update #1