Good question. My vote goes to the employee, for they are hired and given a trust. Seems to me a violation of this trust, in addition to the thievery is worse.
2006-06-27 09:59:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Finnegan 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The employee is worst. The burglar is simply committing the crime of theft. The employee is stealing and committing fraud (by leading the employer to believe the employee is trustworthy)
2006-06-27 17:11:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by Ananke402 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Employee who steals is worse. It's a stab in the back. It'ss like stealing from the hands that feed you.
2006-06-27 18:35:27
·
answer #3
·
answered by Bobbie 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Never bite the hand that feeds. Some one who steals from their own company is just plan stupid, get caught, get fired and no more paycheck, and possibly go to jail, let alone the fact that no one will hire you again with that on your record.
2006-06-27 17:06:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
an employee, because a burglar is doing what he does but the employee is not just stealing from himself but from his co-workers.
2006-06-27 17:00:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ricky H 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I dont believe there is a worst here. They are both stealing .
2006-06-27 16:57:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
employee
2006-06-27 23:27:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by katyswensen70 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
burglar because he's too lazy to actually get a job ;)
2006-06-27 17:10:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋