Have we turned to a two family political system?
2006-06-27 09:44:47 · 18 answers · asked by mymadsky 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I think both Bill and George have "screwed the pooch" for their prospective family members.. anyone affiliated with either the Clintons or the Bushes is now instantly polarized and I don't think they are in a position to get the key "swing votes" that would be needed...
I think America is ready for change... no more Bushes or Clintons... just my opinion...
2006-06-27 10:30:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Neh. It's all over. Somebody else mentioned it: Both the Clintons and the Bush's have become too polarizing to ever be able to realistically hope for a majority vote again. But really, does it matter that much? Who the President is only seems to change the name at the front of the rhetoric. Life does seem to go on either way, for good or for ill. Ho hum.
2006-06-27 10:38:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
To be absolutely honest I have been scared since I witnessed the asassination of John F Kennedy, 36 th President of the United States. I had hopes of a recovery in Actors and the thousand points of light. That put the whole world on notice and kept everybody on their toes. Every day we would wake up and say, "What the hell is he going to do today." Regan was an asset and knew what he was doing. They could not get their hand in the back of his jacket for puppeteering so he got to do some very good things for our country. We could have kept it going had we not sat back and said thought it was fixed and we did not need to vote anymore. Now we have a Dynasty that has evolved into our leader issuing bold statements like, " BRING IT ON!". That has to be the dummest thing ever said and am I scared, yeah I am. Not so much for me but my children.
2006-06-27 09:57:11 · answer #3 · answered by andyman 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It surely does no longer make a large difference. per chance moderate variations, yet particularly, Clinton and Bush had fairly a lot an identical guidelines on terrorism. Clinton signed as many expenditures for secret operations and funding for CIA and jointly with Bush.
2016-10-13 21:37:39 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually that does sound like England. In all honesty, I beg NEITHER family gets another in office. But, if I had to chose the lesser of two evils, I'd chose Hillary. Like chosing between dying by burning at the stake or being hanged, drawn, and quartered.
2006-06-27 09:54:44 · answer #5 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Having lived in Florida for years, the Jeb Bush part doesn't scare me (he actually has a brain unlike his brother), but the rest scares the crap out of me!
2006-06-27 09:48:32 · answer #6 · answered by bvc32282 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only thing scary on the list is future American socialism, um I mean Hillary Clinton.
2006-06-27 09:54:47 · answer #7 · answered by therandman 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The thought of Hilary Clinton or any other woman in the Whitehouse does not scare me.. but another Bush does, altho perhaps this one has a brain.. but I doubt it.
2006-06-27 09:48:37 · answer #8 · answered by Debra H 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As much as Hillary scares me, she can't be worse than what we have now. Then again, maybe I am scared of someone who actually has a brain running the nation as opposed to a puppet.
2006-06-27 09:52:00 · answer #9 · answered by C-Dub 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary Clinton scares me more than anything.
2006-06-27 09:48:34 · answer #10 · answered by tsopolly 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋