English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

I don't think so. There has been no known link between sounds and labor. I did hear that if there is a storm coming, it could get you to have your baby - don't know if that's true but 2 days after a storm, I did have my baby who was born 9 days early from her due date. Was it coincidence? Who knows?!

2006-06-27 08:22:28 · answer #1 · answered by hotmomma23 5 · 2 0

I don't think that is true at all. When I was 30 some weeks pregnant I watched the 4th fireworks with no problem. The baby did wiggle around quite a bit. Have fun!

2006-06-28 00:39:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Ehh Ive never heard of that..besides watching fireworks never really give off too many vibrations. The sounds of course will more than likely make youre lil one move around a bit but you should be fine.

2006-06-27 15:19:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

hm - probably not... most of that stuff is old wives' tales. they recently discovered that even the old standby of having sex during the last few weeks doesn't make you go into labor faster and may even pospone it for a day or so! enjoy the fireworks. if you do go into labor it was going to happen anyway. the baby might kick you a lot, but you probably won't go into labor. :) no worries.

2006-06-27 15:18:06 · answer #4 · answered by ? 5 · 0 0

I don't think so, however my sister did. She called me after watching fireworks and told me that her son was all over the place kicking and she started feeling major pressure and she had the baby 2 days later, but I have to tell you... It was just a coincedence I am sure :)

2006-06-27 15:49:13 · answer #5 · answered by JAngel 3 · 0 0

i've said it once already, YES! I was at a concert and i wasn't jumping around or anything, just close to the speakers. I started feeling sick and i went in. My doctor at the time said that she had heard of bass causeing labor but it was rare and nearly unheard of. But she agreed with me that it may have had something to do with it.

2006-06-27 15:27:08 · answer #6 · answered by Black Widow Mollie 3 · 0 0

Very doubtful. If that happens it will probably be coincendence.

You might get lucky and have a 4th of July baby

2006-06-27 15:18:39 · answer #7 · answered by mand 5 · 0 0

I seriously doubt it, but if it did, that is just 2 less weeks you have to be pregnant! 38 weeks is considered full term.

2006-06-27 15:19:39 · answer #8 · answered by #3ontheway! 4 · 0 0

yes! son july 11th, 2002 almost july 4th.

2006-06-27 16:28:58 · answer #9 · answered by vkewl182 3 · 0 0

no it didn't happen with me and i was 41 weeks.. no labor doctor had to induce me.

2006-06-27 15:19:04 · answer #10 · answered by littlechicky_82 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers