Who believes in creature myths (Loch Ness Monster...?

Question

Bigfoot, Sasquatch.
Their is always little evidence and false sightings. What do you think?

Answer 1

The loch ness monster was confirmed 2 be a hoax.But if everyday, new insects & fishes are discovered, I feel that in certain unexplored parts of the world,( the Amazon, Antartica, etc.) there may be undiscovered creatures. Most of the sea is still unexplored too & down there there are many crevices & places that large monsterous creatures can exist without us ever seeing them.

Answer 2

It is quite difficult to believe in such creatures as the Loch Ness monster or the Sasquatch because the evidence is scant and much of it is of poor quality.

Most of the "evidence" consists of anecdotal stories from witnesses of questionable value. Visual evidence in the form of photos and film is likewise questionable as almost all of it is of horrendous quality. And, much of it has been faked. Physical evidence, such as Sasquatch hair and footprints, is dubious and mainly fails under more rigorous scientific examination.

During the late nineteenth century, reports came out of Africa about a great ape that lived in the highlands. Most people scoffed and were certain it was a hoax. It wasn't until someone actually returned from Africa with the remains of a mountain gorilla that its existence was confirmed and accepted by the scientific community.

Likewise, we know the coelecanthe exists because during the 1930's and later, people would periodically go fishing off the coast of Madagascar and haul one up. Even to this day, people can still go there and catch one.

Since "Nessie", if it exists, is a water creature, perhaps it is difficult to capture a specimen and more difficult to find any remains as they'd be at the bottom of the lake. However, as to Sasquatch, given how much of the Pacific Northwest is now populated by humans, one would think that some lucky hunter would have bagged one by now. Or, one would think that some truck driver would have hit one crossing the freeway. After all, it's not uncommon to see dead mule deer, moose, and other animals along the road.

While it may be unfortunate that a specimen has to die to demonstrate the existence of a species, it is the only completely reliable way to prove its existence.

Answer 3

I think there are creatures in this world that we haven't discovered yet. I'm not sure about Bigfoot, but there have been sighting of creatures similar to the Loch ness Monster for eons and only so many reports can be false, in my opinion. The basis has to be there somewhere.

Answer 4

There are den-finely things in this word we have not found yet. But here something we did find in the past year we dint know was there.

In the Himalayan Mt's a bill goat with gills.
A fish that walks on land..
over 2,000 types of bugs.
Dragon where in fake real, They do have proof. how ever they are nothing like the ones in books that can fly and breath fire.
Even vampire were real to some point (Well not really. It was a out brake of rabies in humans. That is where the blood drink lag ion Begin. Before then they did not drink blood.)

I could go on but I wont... The point is I am not saying I believe in Bigfoot or anything, but I am open to the possible

Answer 5

Crypozoology is a pseudo-science.

Anyway this reminds me of a joke.
There was an Atheist fishing on a lake when his boat it capsized by the lok ness monster. As the Atheist flies through the air he yells out, "God help me!". Suddenly everything freezes, the monster, the boat, even the Atheist is frozen floating in the air over the water. A booming voice from the clouds yells out, "I thought you didn't believe in me!" To which the Atheist replies, "Give me a break! Until 30 seconds ago I didn't believe in the lok ness monster either!"

Q. What do UFO's and smart blondes have in common?
A. People always talk about them, but no one ever sees one.

In conclusion, I currently don't believe in any of it, (except God) but just like smart blondes, I'll belive it when I see it.

Answer 6

The bible talks of giants. also Esau and Cain were both enormous, hairy and tremendous hunters, probably a connection with a bigfoot or Neanderthal. I understand it really is a stretch yet nevertheless interesting. it really is asserted that the interest goat become mistakenly translated. at the same time as someone refers to a scapegoat, what they extremely might want to assert is a scapebigfoot. only don't have an same style of ring to it. the youngsters of Esau went wild and were suggested to be hairy, stay less than rocks and in caves.

Answer 7

Not me, buy my friend made up a name for bigfoot and claims that it is the scientific name for it. He says it is "gigantipificas". I think he believes.

Answer 8

bigfoot sleeps under my bed,the loch ness lives in my pool!!
what you on about??

Answer 9

I BELIEVE IN THEM BOTH