No one prove it was really him. So how could you blame someone doing something before the court prove it. It's illigal by the way.
2006-06-27 05:31:30 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He said he did it. Duh! And more than that the terrorists captured that couldn't make it with the rest were linked to Bin Laden.
And, since Bin Laden isn't an American citizen (Thank goodness!) he isn't entitled to the right layed out in the constitution.
2006-06-27 05:34:54 · answer #1 · answered by Simon 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Aside from the facts he and his group claimed responsibility, gosh I don't know. It is certainly NOT "illigal" to suspect someone before a court "prove" it. Also, al-Qaeda claimed responsibility for the USS Cole, the embassies in Africa, and the beat goes on.
2006-06-27 05:39:25 · answer #2 · answered by aboukir200 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They had a documentary on a major news channel, and they showed the history of Bin Laden. Some of the American leaders today are smart, so I think they know what they are doing.
2006-06-27 05:36:34 · answer #3 · answered by Kassi 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was bragging about it! Weren't you watching the news??? And as far as being innocent until proven guilty - he's not an American citizen, therefore, he has no protection under the Constitution.
Be glad I'm not running things...his head would wind up on a stake in the middle of Times Square.
2006-06-27 05:38:41 · answer #4 · answered by Tish 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
COME ON--- I EVEN BELEIVE HE DID and joe gragan tried to kill kennedy but the poor drunk basterd woke up when the car hit the water.To bad they hit the girl so hard she never regained conscienceness and drowned.All because teddy was dragging the family name thru the mudd and something needed to be done.JUST one of over 5000 conspericy theeorys i have about america and the politicians who run it .BIN laden came out and admitted it before and after so you can not say we went after him on a whim like we did in iraq
2006-06-27 05:45:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Illegal? In what way? Slanderous? Bin Laden is a terrorist (by his own admission) and is not immune from such blame, particularly since he has willingly taken on the blame for the attacks.
2006-06-27 05:36:07 · answer #6 · answered by PermDude 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Some do think it, some don't. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, wether he did it or not (I'm pretty sure he said himself he did do it)
People can blame anyone they want for anything they want. This is America and we have that right. That doesn't mean he did or didn't, but we can think whatever we want.
It is not illegal, by the way. To stick him in prison for that specific crime without proof, or allowing defense would be illegal, but blaming him for it is not.
2006-06-27 05:38:19 · answer #7 · answered by N8ball88 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the two the CIA or hitmen from the Illuminati -- like the Krewe of Comus out of recent Orleans -- maximum in all hazard did in JFK over govt Order 11110. (regardless of the incontrovertible fact that JFK did issues to tick off the army, CIA, Oil adult males and greater). it would perhaps have been the Zionists (Illuminati & Rothschild leaning persons) who did the WTC on 911 to suck us into yet yet another conflict. in spite of everything, wasn't it William Morgan who became murdered by ability of the freemasons on 9-11-1826 ?!?!?! You circulate.... and God Bless united states of america!
2016-12-08 13:08:42 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because it was definitely Al Quida that was behind what happened on 9/11. and he is the leader of that group. besides, if i'm not mistaken videotapes have been shown with him bragging about what he did on 9/11
2006-06-27 05:35:45 · answer #9 · answered by purple rain 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It WAS him.
Problem solved.
And innocent until proven guilty is only effective when you are in fact, in the United States, which I may add is the most awesome freakin country ever.
2006-06-27 05:35:39 · answer #10 · answered by Punchinello 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋