This I gotta hear.
2006-06-27 05:17:05 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Well, if I had to explain it I'd say it was ED. Not that I'm a RUSHIE or really anxious to dwell on his... well, problem. Although I don't think its a surprise to anyone, regardless of the political point of view that they espouse that he'd have trouble "south of the border." Kind of ironic actually.
2006-06-27 07:10:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
From Yahoo news
Limbaugh's doctor had prescribed the Viagra, but it was "labeled as being issued to the physician rather than Mr. Limbaugh for privacy purposes," Roy Black, Limbaugh's attorney, said in a statement.
2006-06-27 05:21:19 · answer #2 · answered by obviously_you'renotagolfer 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Innocent until proved guilty. Really - no charges even filed plus 2nd degree misdemeanor (can we look thru your medicines & house or suitcases - not same as airport since he has private plane) We do not know if his doctor filled them to save him time or he was delivering them or picked up wrong bottle. Official explanation was he was trying to avoid just what has - the liberal media splashing his private life across the front page & lefties from making fun of a physical condition. He is smarter than I thought. No Rush fan here, but learned well from Clinton & other Libs for reasoning.
2006-06-27 05:40:45 · answer #3 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First....stop acting like he was busted smoking crack.
Second...wait until the facts come out...Rush's side of the story is that the prescription was for him, but was labeled with his doctors' name for privacy purposes. If you were famous and needed Viagra...would you have it filled under your name? Probably not. What ever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
Third: Rush is a radio talk show host...not an elected official (ummm...Kennedy..) so who cares?
2006-06-27 05:23:54 · answer #4 · answered by loubean 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's funny how the right wants this played down , but if it had been a liberal , Rush would have been the first to make a big deal out of it and you Conservatives know it . He would have made his whole show about it . You know , what goes around comes around .
2006-06-27 05:35:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I certainly don't think this is the venue where I would discuss him. You have already found him guilty of a crime as have many of the small minded liberals that have answered this question. I enjoy his radio show and continue to listen to it daily. Why don't you ever mention the liberals in your own party who have committed real crimes, (elected officials????) . Or maybe you're not aware of any, right????
2006-06-27 05:52:46 · answer #6 · answered by rosi l 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm REALLY trying not to think about Rush Limbaugh with that "rare" 4 hour erection that is mentioned on the advertisement.
2006-06-27 05:33:38 · answer #7 · answered by Pitchow! 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh, no. HE WAS USING SOMEONE ELSES PERSCRIPITION DRUGS. Lock him up and throw away the key. Better yet, give him the death penalty. I am against it for murderers and stuff, but using someone else's non addictive perscription that doesn't get you high, thats another story.
Next thing you know, we'll find out THAT HE ONCE GOT A TRAFFIC TICKET!!!
Get a life.
2006-06-27 05:25:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anon28 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow, you really come up with some interesting and thought-provoking questions that highlight just how serious liberals are about the great issues of the day.
Thanks for properly representing modern American liberalism.
2006-06-27 05:24:40 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh Jim, when you have a subject that really matters to somebody, get back to us.
Or at least wait till you get out of middle school.
2006-06-28 00:34:26 · answer #10 · answered by Vincent Valentine 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋