JUST THINK IT COULD BE WCW ALL OVER AGAIN
2006-06-27 02:32:18 · 9 answers · asked by moony69_2001 1 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
THIIS GOES TO THEY GUY THEROCK...TNA DIDN'T GIVE UP WCW,YA MORON,IT IS 2 DIFFERENT OWNERS!
2006-06-27 03:12:29 · update #1
WHY IS EVERYONE SAYING NO???GET OFF THE WWE'S JOCK AND REALIZE,THE WWE WOULD BE BETTER IF THEY HAD COMPETITION
2006-06-27 05:36:41 · update #2
I would love to see TNA skyrocket in the future. The Spike would move it to Monday nights at the same time as RAW. Ratings would go up for both brands. I think it was the competition and rivalry of two big companies that made it fun to watch wrestling. Seeing who would out do each other is very entertaining. With WWE owning everything it would be nice to see some competiton.
2006-06-27 02:52:36 · answer #1 · answered by Marcus A 1 · 3⤊ 4⤋
I don't know if its ever realistic to say that TNA will ever beat WWE in ratings, WWE has its fans and most will stay loyal, but if TNA can even approach the ratings of WWE its a good sign for the industry which translates into good things for wrestlers and wrestling fans. I would love to see TNA doing about a 3 rating and Raw pulling a 5 because it would mean that the Downturn in professional wrestling was coming to an end.
2006-06-29 01:29:24 · answer #2 · answered by Bobby the Brain 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not possible...Why do you think TNA gave up WCW in the first place??
2006-06-27 10:03:09 · answer #3 · answered by J.R. 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
2006-06-27 09:58:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
not with it's current time slot but it is a much better product.
2006-06-27 09:47:58 · answer #5 · answered by thetirks 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NOT A CHANCE, SPIKE TV MIDNITES WHO WANTS TO STAY UP ALL NIGHT
2006-06-27 09:36:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
noooooooo
2006-06-27 12:30:57 · answer #7 · answered by tri.nayak 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NOBODY WITH A BRAIN
2006-06-27 10:12:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
not me
2006-06-27 10:26:02 · answer #9 · answered by Hafeman 5000 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋