2006-06-26 22:15:35 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Social Science ➔ Sociology
There is never only 1 choice in any decision.
2006-06-26 22:25:59 · answer #1 · answered by Simon D 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Assuming that the train driver is actually driving the train that is about to hit either the child or the group of children:
1) what is the train doing on a stretch of unused track?
2) the train driver does not have a choice as he cannot steer the train - all he can do is sound the horn, apply the brakes and say a few prayers.
2006-06-27 05:25:18 · answer #2 · answered by k² 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How could he hit the child on the unused track? Is he still in the train? Or is he just out to beat up kids?
2006-06-27 05:20:56 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
if there is no way he can stop then if it were me i would head 4 the 1 child i no it makes me sound horrible but i would rather risk hurting 1 then a group of children
2006-06-27 05:21:53 · answer #4 · answered by lauren m 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The train driver can do nothing other than sound his horn and slam on his brakes. The is no moral issue involved here as he cannot steer the train.
2006-06-27 05:19:38 · answer #5 · answered by trebs 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What do you mean.." a group of child that he is heading?".Trains run on fixed tracks.You make no sense.
2006-06-27 06:01:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Its a bit like ten pin bowling really, the more you hit the more points you get
2006-06-27 19:27:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What's he doing on an "UNUSED" track??
2006-06-27 05:19:21 · answer #8 · answered by BackMan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Is there any way at all thay he can run them all over maybe?
2006-06-27 05:19:50 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on which way his load is going.
2006-06-27 05:19:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋